Talk:Unown/GA1
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 03:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 00:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Will review this in the next few days, looking forward to reading it!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Concept and creation
- "It is generally not used in battle due to its low stats and limited move pool." - This sentence is weird, and weirdly placed here? Can it be expanded, but it also feels like it belongs more in the appearances section since it's more about Gameplay.
Appearances
- "Twenty-six forms of Unown were added" - This feels like it'd be better to say or be clarified that it's covering the basic letters of the alphabet unknown. I mean it feels like a given with the 26 but it still count slip someone up when translated.
- There's also a problem of "they" and "it" used interchangably, and they is probably the better option for most cases as we're talking about the species with multiple forms, or in some cases where that wording wouldn't flow well just say Unknown instead of a pronoun.
- Did some fixes with the anime/manga paragraph, but small thing, the TCG title should be italicized.
Promotion and reception
- Did a few small tweaks on my own here, but one thing to bring up, when condensing a sentence, use [...] instead of the trailing elipses, as it indicates that better.
- I need to check what the MOS is about the prize money, if we should use "2000 USD" or "$2000". If it's the former wikilinking USD may be a good idea.
Basic pass is looking good thus far though, it's a strong article about one of the game's more misaligned species.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 02:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Kung Fu Man I believe I've hit up all of the points you've addressed. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Alright, did a spot check on 11, 22 and 34, all are looking good. Passing, nicely done!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.