Talk:Tangzhong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from
Talk:Water roux
)

Use dmy dates

I added Use dmy dates as we had two formats showing. I picked it based on the first contributor being from London, but we could certainly change it if there's a better reason. KarenJoyce (talk) 19:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inventor

According to a blog,[1][2] the inventor of this method is Mitsuo Ayano (綾野光男) from Japan. Ayano wrote about this in his book "ALL BREADS"[3] published in 1961. The man who claims to be Ayano's apprentice in this blog is detailed, so I think it is reliable, but since it is a personal blog, it is not a valid quote from wikipedia. Is there anyone who can investigate Ayano?--2400:4052:2DA1:D400:4868:F426:2249:B97B (talk) 16:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Requested move 11 August 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 10:48, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


WP:COMMONNAME in recent English sources. Most of the sources cited in this article primarily use the term "tangzhong" and only mention "water roux" as an alternative. Although Google Scholar [4] returns several relevant results for "water roux," these are all from 2018 or earlier, and tangzhong has increased in popularity since then. I believe that the title "tangzhong" will be more easily recognized by readers searching for the article. Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 00:38, 11 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 09:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Support Seems to be a good case for why "tangzhong" is more common in sources. If "water roux" becomes more popular, then the article can be changed back. Fredlesaltique (talk) 13:46, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.