Talk:We Can Do It!/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 21:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Will review this. Looks good! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review

• Very nice article. I copy edited a little, mostly for conciseness and removal of repetition, but feel free to revert.[1]

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:

   B. Complies with

   list incorporation

   :

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Provides references to all sources:

   B. Provides

   reliable sources

   where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Main aspects are addressed:

   B. Remains focused:

4. Does it follow the
   neutral point of view
   policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have

   fair use rationales

   :

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with

   suitable captions

   :

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• A pass. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stellar! Thanks so much for the review. Binksternet (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great article/review! Thanks. Gandydancer (talk) 12:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]