Talk:Wells Fargo Building (Philadelphia)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the

nomination
for Good Article status.

I aim to post a preliminary review within 48 hours. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:09, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

My apologies for the delay on this, real life issues. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

here
for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (
    lists
    )
    :
    Prose is good, I made a few minor copy-edits. Accords with key elements of the MoS.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to
    reliable sources): c (OR
    ):
    Statements are well referenced to RS, no evidence of OR.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Thorough with no unnecessary trivia.
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Article is stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have
    suitable captions
    )
    :
    Images licensed and tagged
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    An interesting article. Once again my apologies for the delay in completing the review. I have thoroughly read the article, made a few minor copy-edits and am happy to pass this as worthy of GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]