Talk:West Worldham/GA1

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (

   lists

   ):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to

   reliable sources): c (OR

   ):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the
   neutral point of view
   policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have

   suitable captions

   ):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Another great job, Dr. Blofeld! --Thine Antique Pen (talk • contributions) 16:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reviews, I'm used to a lot more criticism though! They're not as good as nearby Bentworth but they're smaller villages and are pretty comprehensive on what exists on the web. West Worldham is a hamlet really.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:02, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]