Talk:William Harper (Rhodesian politician)/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 13:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this over the next few days. --Coemgenus (talk) 13:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, hope you enjoy it. —  Cliftonian (talk)  18:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (

   lists

   ):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (

   reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism

   ):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

Images

• All look appropriate, the fair use one is legit.

Early life

• "During 1940 he was one of "The Few"—the Allied pilots of the Battle of Britain, in which he flew with No. 17 Squadron and was wounded in action." I know what you're saying here, but it might be more easily understood if broken into two sentences.

• I've redone this whole bit, hope it's okay now. —  Cliftonian (talk)  18:30, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dominion Party

• "... the opposition Dominion Party (which called for full "dominion" or Commonwealth realm status)." What was the other party's position?

• The governing United Federal Party also aspired to Commonwealth realm status, but the Dominion Party were more radical—kind of like the Conservatives and UKIP in today's British politics. —  Cliftonian (talk)  18:30, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's it. Not much in need of fixing here. I'm looking forward to promoting it. Thanks for writing another good Rhodesia article. --Coemgenus (talk) 16:42, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing this and for the kind words. I've replied to each point above. I've expanded the RAF service part quite a bit, maybe have another look to be sure. I'm glad you seem to have enjoyed the article. Cheers, —  Cliftonian (talk)  18:30, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It all looks good and I'm glad to pass it. --Coemgenus (talk) 20:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I'm glad you like it. Cheers, —  Cliftonian (talk)  07:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]