Talk:World Marathon Majors

project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
To-do list: edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

Athletics High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catherine also got a 2nd at this year's Olympics, right? Shouldn't that be added to her WMM list? Runner456 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who pays for the prize money? -- Beland (talk) 12:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, details, details... Why the specific questions? Stevenmitchell (talk) 15:07, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, it is an entirely anonymous website maintained by an unknown and unnamed organization, with no known address or contact information, or any specific persons having any responsibility for the organization. The money that is given is apparently done so through anonymous donors at an anonymous ceremony at an undisclosed location somewhere in the world (presumably on Earth). It is quite unusual for a professional website to deliberately and intentionally not disclose any ownership of the site or organization at all. Is it the intention of the organization owner to deceive visitors? Stevenmitchell (talk) 01:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've always assumed it was the race organisers and IAAF that jointly funded this competition. It would be good to get confirmation of that. The ownership of the website by "World Marathon Majors" is clear in the terms and conditions, so it's not a massive mystery – it's quite common for funding of a private enterprise not to be published. Indeed, that is one of the benefits of being a private company over being a publicly-traded one. SFB 10:26, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It appears excessive to include so many athletes. The article length is getting very long without providing much additional information. I suggest creating one table with just the winners:

Series (years) | Men (name, country, points) | Women (name, country, points)

The full tables could be moved to a separate article, if it is believed there is value in retaining the information.

FunkyCanute (talk) 14:03, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please rewrite the article's first paragraph so that it is more coherent for the reader/consumer? Stevenmitchell (talk) 15:07, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]