Search results
There is a page named "Talk:Zermelo set theory" on Wikipedia
- Conglomerate (set theory))category theory, the term "conglomerate" replaces the term "set" in non-conservative extensions of axiomatic set theories, like Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory, Von...80 KB (11,686 words) - 22:51, 30 January 202418:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC) I first came across it as Fränkel, in "Zermelo Fränkel set theory". Furthermore, a quick Google search for "Abraham Fränkel reveals...2 KB (194 words) - 12:15, 14 February 2024Is there any particular reason why this article, along with Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory and Shimura–Taniyama theorem, all use the "–" character in the...23 KB (3,911 words) - 18:43, 4 January 2024Talk:Von Neumann universe (section Zermelo was the true author of the so-called von Neumann universe)same members (i.e. none) yet they are distinct. Then you are not in Zermelo set theory at all and you will have to change the definition of the von Neumann...55 KB (8,795 words) - 07:24, 28 May 2024discuss this. While the claim in the article is a theorem of the Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZF), the article does not discuss ZF, where the claim would...10 KB (1,519 words) - 06:26, 17 March 2024"Constructions based on set theory" section of the Natural Numbers page, the Zermelo ordinals are also cited as possible set-theoretic definition of the...11 KB (1,661 words) - 06:54, 9 February 2024
- Wikipedia's entry on the axiom: > in words: > Given any set A, there is a set B such that, given any set x, x is a member of B if and only if x is a member
)