Talk:Zoroastrianism/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article no longer meets the

that does not summarize the article. Finally I have minor concerns regarding criterion 3a, since the article leaves out the establishment of the religion almost entiely, and simply "askes" the reader to refer to the article on Zoroaster.

I will leave this reassessment open for a week. If not major work to start referencing and reworking the lead is initiated, I will delist the article. Note that the criteria have changed since the article was listed in 2006, and it is much harder (particularly regarding referencing) to get an article to GA status today. Arsenikk ^(talk) 14:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Question: what is the matter with Harvard, or its "style"? Wikipedia is not worth people's trouble, don't you see why Zoroastrianism has gone down this road? No Zoroastrian would have anything to do with it. I hope your suggestions and actions help with it. What a sad day this is.
• RevAntonio (talk) 04:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

None of the matters have been seen to in the week, so I have delisted the article. If the article later meets the GA criteria, feel free to nominate it at

]