This template is within the scope of WikiProject Inline Templates, a collaborative effort to improve and manage Wikipedia's inline footnote, cleanup and dispute templates. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Some discussion of this template may take place at the project's talk page, rather than here.Inline TemplatesWikipedia:WikiProject Inline TemplatesTemplate:WikiProject Inline TemplatesInline Templates articles
This template was considered for deletion on 2013 March 12. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".
This template was considered for deletion on 2013 July 14. The result of the discussion was "keep".
Can you not use Template:Clarify to note issues with citation styles?
Firstly, that's not what the template is for. Secondly, this sort of thing does not need to be tagged. If you don't want to fix it yourself, leave it alone.--Dodo bird (talk) 22:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
{{
WP:CIVILPOV if they are problematic), because it takes work to do them properly, and disruptive editors won't bother. — SMcCandlishTalk⇒ ɖ⊝כ⊙þ Contrib. 22:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Followup: I wasn't available at the time to say so (and won't be again, for an indeterminate amount of time), but I support the idea at the end of the TfD[1] to repurpose
Template:Clarifyref and Clarifyref2, and then redir them to Template:Full. I think that the TfD didn't close with a consensus to do anything because of my absence, after I'd been the principal "KEEP" !voter. — SMcCandlishTalk⇒ ɖ⊝כ⊙þ Contrib. 19:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Redirected
{{
Clarifyref2}} to it. Going this route appears to have been the only progressive solution proposed at the first TfD, and I would have !voted in support of it had I been around. I've been the principal defender of these templates since I created them, anyway. — SMcCandlish ☺☏¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 09:59, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
Moved from User talk:SMcCandlish