Template talk:Olympic Winter Games Host Cities
Cosmetics
I like the template, but I was wondering if we could make it more compact (less white space) and more symmetrical. For example, I think it might make more sense to use the short version of the names, e.g., "Chamonix" and "Oslo" rather than "Chamonix, France" and "Oslo, Norway." Also, the logo and title appear lopsided. --Leifern 16:06, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Take a look now, and see what you think. It's been condensed quite a bit, but the top is still giving me some difficulty. — ArkansasTraveler 16:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
I personally feel this template should have the same outlook as the Olympic Summer Games template, especially so each host city get bolded on the respective city article. Someone who'd like to set this into action? :) Erik 12:54, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:Olympic Winter Games Host Cities
- The result of the debate was keep. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 February 23. -Splashtalk 01:26, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
In my opinion, this template's got to go, or atleast be fixed. I was at the
Dynamic template
To have a more consistent look, I'd prefer the version with the
- I, too, like the dynamic box. Make sure that if you change it back, you also make sure the summer host cities template has the dynamic box, too. red 19:07, 10 May 2006 (UTC)]
Erzurum
Why there is the city "Erzurum" (2011) in box? As I know exectly, it isn't an Olimpic city. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Жабыш (talk • contribs) 14:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)