The Dependent Gene
The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for books. (September 2019) |
The Dependent Gene: The Fallacy of "Nature vs. Nurture" is a book by developmental psychologist
caused by a mutation in a single gene, but can easily be treated through dietary intervention. He argues that PKU, like all traits, is both genetic and environmental in origin.[2] He also critiques the fundamental concept of a discrete "gene", arguing that the function-based boundaries that are claimed to separate genes from one another have changed over time.[3]
Reception
neo-Darwinian view of evolution accessible to a wide range of nonspecialists, including advanced undergraduates and graduate students in the behavioral and cognitive sciences."[4] The book was also reviewed favorably in Publishers Weekly, which wrote, "Scientists and social service providers will be intrigued by this well-written, insightful and far more optimistic view of human development and evolution than most that have come before."[5] Julie Buckles, writing in Genome News Network, was more critical in her review of the book. She concluded, "By the end, I found myself more confused than convinced. Moore complains, with some validity, about "the tendency of journalists to excitedly report not-yet-proven associations between traits and genes." Though he makes a well-meaning effort to clarify a complex area of biology, his treatment of the material is unlikely to serve as a primer for the general public."[6]
References
- PMC 2223161.
- ^ Angier, Natalie (25 February 2003). "A REVOLUTION AT 50; Not Just Genes: Moving Beyond Nature vs. Nurture". The New York Times. Retrieved 11 February 2019.
- ISSN 1092-311X.
- .
- ^ "THE DEPENDENT GENE: The Fallacy of Nature vs. Nurture". Publishers Weekly. Retrieved 11 February 2019.
- ^ Buckles, Julie (30 August 2002). "Genes Don't Act Alone". Genome News Network. Retrieved 11 February 2019.
See also
- The Agile Gene