Transient expression
This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject.(March 2018) |
Transient expression, more frequently referred to "transient gene expression", is the temporary
Methodology varies depending on the organism to
Advantages
When choosing between inducing transient or stable expression in cells, time frame and experimental goal must be taken into consideration. Transiently transfected cells are often used to study the effects of short-term gene expression, perform
If stable, long-term gene expression is desired, stable transfection of cells is more useful. However, since successful integration of a DNA vector into the chromosome is a rare occurrence, this process is more difficult and time-consuming, and is reserved for large-scale protein production, gene therapies, and long-term pharmacology studies.
Expression in Plant Cells
Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation
The dominant technology used for the production of transgenic plants for transient expression is Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation, or "agroinfiltration," and virus expression machinery.[6] Agrobacterium tumefaciens and related Agrobacterium species are well-known plant pathogens that have been engineered to efficiently transfer specific pieces of DNA (called transfer DNA, or T-DNA) into the plant nucleus using binary vector systems, which consists of a T-DNA binary vector and a vir helper plasmid.[7] This binary vector separates T-DNA from trans-acting virulence proteins that help mediate the transfer.[8] Advantages of this method include modularity of broad host-range plasmids of small size through standard molecular biology techniques. Furthermore, since the parent tumor-inducing plasmid in Agrobacterium strains have been disarmed and only non-reproductive cells have been modified (as opposed to germ-line modifications), the process is considered environmentally harmless.[6]
Applications of this process has resulted in advancements made in the use of plants to synthetic biology. Plant-derived bioproducts show promise of high competitiveness towards traditional mammalian cell expression systems.
Expression in Mammalian Cells
Mammalian cell expression systems are essential for the transient production of recombinant proteins and their complementary post-translational modifications. In fact, approximately half of the current commercially available therapeutic proteins are produced in mammalian cells. However, mammalian cell systems' slow growth, precise growth requirements, and potential risk of infection by animal viruses present a number of challenges. As a result, a growing number of mammalian cell lines have been established to serve as hosts for transient recombinant protein production.[2]
HEK293 cells
Although other cells lines, such as African green monkey kidney (COS) and baby hamster kidney (BHK), can be used for recombinant protein production, the most commonly employed host system in transient expression of mammalian cells involves derivatives of the HEK293 cell line, which is based on the human embryonic kidney cell line established in 1977 by Graham et al.[9] The HEK293 cell line was created via transformation with sheared Adenovirus 5 DNA.[10] Advantages of using this cell line include their high rates of transfection and ability to grow in a serum-free medium, which results in reduced cost and lowered risk of contamination with animal-derived material typically found in serum.[2]
Several engineered sublines were later developed by incorporating viral elements derived from mammalian viruses, such as SV40 virus or
Typical historical yields of transient expression in HEK293 cells transfected using PEI-25kDa was 20-40 mg/L of recombinant antibody protein. In 2008, Backliwal et. al reported for the first time yields crossing 1 g/L of recombinant antibody protein.[12]
CHO cells
Traditionally, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are associated with the establishment of stable cell lines for biologics. Recently, however, attempts to engineer CHO cells for transient protein production have garnered recognition. CHO cells were among the earliest established cell lines for in vitro cultivation, and their potential as a host for production and manufacturing of biological products remains popular.[11] CHO cells are preferable for transient expression due to their easy industrial scale-up, versatility for the production of diverse biomolecules, and low risk of infection of human viruses, among other advantages.[13] Three primary expression systems have been established:
- EBNA-1-engineered CHO cell line
- CHO EBNA LT cell line, which is carried apart from the EBNA-1 gene and the mouse polyomavirus large T antigen[14]
- EpiCHO system, which consists of a CHO cell line transfected with the polyomavirus large T antigen gene and a DNA expression vector encoding polyomavirus origin (PyOri) for autonomous replication and EBV EBNA-1 and OriP for plasmid retention.[15][16]
References
- ISBN 978-0-08-088504-9.
- ^ ISBN 9781555819378.
- OCLC 870891982.
- ISBN 978-94-007-2216-3.
- ISBN 9781907568374.
- ^ PMID 24631883.
- PMID 6095209.
- ISSN 0168-9452.
- OCLC 798095845.
- PMID 886304.
- ^ PMID 22735955.
- PMID 18617574.)
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link - S2CID 20068880.
- PMID 16306599.
- S2CID 42312966.
- PMID 15948170.
External links
- Canto T (2016). "Transient Expression Systems in Plants: Potentialities and Constraints". Advanced Technologies for Protein Complex Production and Characterization. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Vol. 896. pp. 287–301. PMID 27165332.
- Grimsley N, Hohn B, Hohn T, Walden R (May 1986). ""Agroinfection," an alternative route for viral infection of plants by using the Ti plasmid". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 83 (10): 3282–3286. PMID 16593697.
- Patrick M. "Plasmids 101: Yeast Vectors". blog.addgene.org.
- "Transient vs. Stable Expression". www.genscript.com.