Tuff City Records
Tuff City Records | |
---|---|
Founded | 1981 |
Founder | Aaron Fuchs |
Genre | Hip hop, doo-wop, dancehall |
Country of origin | U.S. |
Location | New York City |
Official website | www |
Tuff City Records is a New York–based record label founded by journalist Aaron Fuchs in 1981.[1] Initially concentrating on hip hop music, the label's roster expanded to include doo-wop, dancehall, and hip hop–jazz fusion, and releases included reissues of music from as far back as the 1940s.[1]
History
Aaron Fuchs was a journalist with
In subsequent years the label began reissue projects in soul with Soul-Tay-Shus Records, funk with Funky Delicacies, and New York Latin music with Andale Records. Via its subsidiary Tufamerica, Tuff City became also known for suing artists like Kanye West and the Beastie Boys for their use of samples the rights to which Tuff City acquired for this purpose.[8][9]
In another case, Tuff City sued EMI records for its failure to pay royalties to Tuff City in connection with songs credited to the late George Patterson. EMI countered that Tuff City did not have proper chain of title.[10] The case is ongoing, but its status is unknown since the subsequent purchase and break-up of EMI by Universal Music in 2013.[10]
References
- ^ a b c d e f Verna, Paul (1994) "Tuff City Records Moves Forward and Looks Back," Billboard, July 16, 1994, retrieved 2010-08-29
- ISBN 978-1-58980-677-1, p. 125
- ISBN 978-1-56639-362-1, p. 9
- ISBN 978-0-415-96918-5, p. 455
- ^ Reynolds, J.R. (1995) "Tuff City Plans Aggressive Campaign for Rap Reissues," Billboard, June 24, 1995, retrieved 2010-08-29
- CMJ New Music Monthly, October 1995, retrieved 2010-08-29
- ^ Tuff City Records, Night Train International Product Overview. Retrieved 2012-01-02.
- ^ "Kanye West's Latest Sample Lawsuit Puts Him in Good Company". October 2012.
- ^ "The Beastie Boys Beat Lawsuit over 'Paul's Boutique' Sampling". The Hollywood Reporter. 25 March 2015.
- ^ a b TufAmerica, Inc. v EMI Music Inc. Supreme Court, New York County, 651197/2011, docket entry 49