User:Bon courage
The Cynic's Appendix
If
New, then perhaps this is the Apocrypha
?
- Wikipedia is famously the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. This is not necessarily a good thing.
- For working on content in controversial areas, it is better to be beloved by admins, than to be an admin.
- If a new editor draws attention to their newness in their initial edits, they're not new.
- Any editor who argues their point by invoking donations to Wikipedia, has no viable point.
- Any editor who argues their point by invoking "editor retention", is not an editor Wikipedia wants to retain.
- A sure tell of a POV-pushing argument is when WP:PSTSis truncatedly quoted as "primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia ..."
- Certain words and phrases are strongly indicative of WP:PROFRINGEproclivities: allopathic (except in a historical context), healing arts, medical (or scientific) dogma, modality, pseudoskeptic, scientism, and Western medicine.
- AP2 rots your teeth.
- Any editor who uses the word "bias" as an adjective, will turn out not to understand WP:NPOV.
- Rejoice when your callow opponent posts to your mature, well-watched User Talk page: the bat signalis now aloft.
- Any editor who quotes Mahatma Gandhi's "first they ignore you, then they laugh at you ..." in support for their point, doesn't have a point that deserves to progress beyond the "laugh" stage.
Essays
- Lede bombing (WP:LEDEBOMB)
- A POV that draws a source (WP:POVSOURCING)
- WP:BIGMISTAKE
- WP:CRYMEDRS
Userboxes
|