User:FT2/8W

This is a summary of what Wikipedia is, and how its various major policies tie into that.

The impetus for this was driven by broad discussion of Wikipedia:neutral point of view on that policy's talk page. In looking at NPOV, it became obvious that part of the problem is that there's no clear single statement defining Wikipedia that *also* shows how other major policies tie integrally into that definition. At present it is more like a rough definition of Wikipedia, plus a (fairly separate) policies list and individual explanations/justifications of these.

This is an attempt to remedy that, by defining Wikipedia clearly and concisely in a way that shows exactly how the other major policies and practices tie into it and why they are essential corollaries to that purpose. Please go gently and constructive views rather than flames. Thanks

FT2 02:48, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

About Wikipedia // Wikipedia's goals

Wikipedia is a neutral and unbiased compilation of notable, verifiable facts.
This can be expanded as follows:

• Neutral: Wikipedia does not judge or advocate specific views, or choose between them. Rather, it judges the value to users of neutrally representing different views.
• Unbiased: Views are allowed to speak for themselves rather than being cast into one "right" viewpoint.
• Compilation: Wikipedia is not a simple collection or list of facts. There is a process of summarizing, grading, organizing and collating involved, to ensure that the resulting articles are as useful as possible for readers seeking both detail and overview.
• Notable: A view is generally considered notable if it is potentially information of value or interest in some way to a significant number of people, or to some perspective, or its omission would leave a significant gap in historical human knowledge of a subject. Even minority, controversial and discredited views are often notable. Often it is valuable to see how people thought, or competing views of the time. By contrast many fringe views are not notable by this definition, because they are not sufficiently significant or had little or minor impact in their field as a whole.
• Verifiable: Information must be objectively verifiable, including being
  cited
  from a credible source.
• Facts: Wikipedia contains facts, not opinions, and not
  original research
  . Since any opinion of note has been expressed by some person or group of people, we do not try to decide or claim that an opinion is "true" or "false". We state instead, neutrally and factually, which people hold what views, and allow the facts to speak for themselves.

For information to be included in Wikipedia, it should at a minimum be both notable and verifiable.

• If it is verifiable but not notable, it is by definition below a certain threshold of importance, and will not usually merit recording, no matter how true.
• If it is notable but not verifiable, it is effectively hearsay.

Unimportant matters or hearsay are usually outside the scope of Wikipedia.
If a view is both notable and verifiable, and not original research, then it may be appropriate to record it in Wikipedia, in which case:

1. Wikipedia:neutral point of view ("WP:NPOV") is the core policy that informs how facts must be represented and articles written.
2. Wikipedia:cite your sources
   ("WP:CITE") are the twin statements explaining how verifiability should be checked and documented.
3. Other policies and guidelines cover ancillary matters such as appropriate user conduct, style and content, and copyright compliance.