User:IDIC-Linguist/Sofia Ongele/Foureyeslinguistics Peer Review
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
General info
- Whose work are you reviewing?
Gizelleg25, IDIC-Linguist, Scribepedia
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:IDIC-Linguist/Sofia_Ongele?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Sofia Ongele
Evaluate the drafted changes
- Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? I would say she appeared or was featured in the documentary, I feel like the use of "star" means a fictional role.
- Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?It seems pretty neutral to me, discussing her life and experiences.
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? It focuses heavily on her activism and coding experience.
- Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? " She also began providing coding mentoring to her peers." doesn't have a citation and I feel like it's a claim that needs one. The previous sentence said "at 17..." so does that still apply to this sentence or was it later?
- Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? There are a lot of sources and they seem to be reliable.
- Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added? With so many sources, it seems like there could be more to add. In the sandbox, there was a note about how the app had the ability to have information deleted for privacy or it could be taken to the police as evidence, I think this could be incorporated into the information about the app.