User:Kevlar/Sports Notability

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This guideline is used to help evaluate whether or not a

general notability guideline
, and thus merit an article in Wikipedia. The article must provide reliable sources showing that the subject meets the general notability guideline or the sport specific criteria set forth below.

If the article does meet the criteria set forth below, then it is likely that sufficient sources exist to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. Failing to meet the criteria in this guideline means that notability will need to be established in other ways (e.g. the general notability guideline, or other, topic-specific, notability guidelines).

Please note that the failure to meet these criteria does not mean an article must be deleted; conversely, the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. These are merely rules of thumb which some editors choose to keep in mind when deciding whether or not to keep an article that is on articles for deletion, along with relevant guidelines such as Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources.

Applicable policies and guidelines

All information included in Wikipedia, including articles about sports, must be

WP:ORG
.

Subjects that do not meet the sport-specific criteria outlined in this guideline may still be notable if they meet the

subject specific notability guideline
.

Any athletic entertainment event where the results are at least partially predetermined or scripted is not covered by this page. For participants in such events (e.g.

Electronic sports participants are covered by the criteria of this guideline.[1]

Basic criteria

A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published

Olympics
).

  • Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may be used to support content in an article, but it is not sufficient to establish notability. This includes listings in database sources with low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion, such as the College Football Data Warehouse.
  • Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.
  • Some sources must be used with particular care when establishing notability, and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Local sources must be clearly independent of the subject, and must provide a level of coverage beyond
    WP:ROUTINE
    . Listings of statistics must clearly satisfy the requirement for significant coverage.

Visual comparison of sports notability

Sport Amateur Participation Professional Participation Non-Athletes Won a Significant Professional Honor Won a Significant Amateur Honor Competed for Professional Championship Competed for Amateur Championship # of Participation # of Leagues Top 10 League Notability Temporary
American football/Canadian football No Yes Yes 6+
Association football Yes Yes Yes hundreds?
Athletics/track & field and long-distance running Yes Yes Yes up to 8 7
Australian rules football Yes Yes Yes 1
Badminton Yes Yes Yes Yes 6
Baseball Yes Yes Yes 12
Basketball Yes Yes Yes 8
Boxing Yes Yes Yes
Cricket Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2?
Curling Yes Yes Yes Yes 5?
Cycling Yes Yes Yes Yes 4
Equestrian sport Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4
Figure skating Yes Yes Yes 6+
Golf Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 17
Gymnastics Yes Yes Yes 8?
Horse racing Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 ?
Ice hockey Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ?
Kickboxing No Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 Yes Yes
Mixed martial arts No No Yes 3 2+ Yes Yes
Motorsports Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ?
Rodeo No Yes Yes Yes 4
Rugby league Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ?
Rugby union Yes Yes Yes ?
Sumo Yes 2?
Tennis Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 18?
Triathlon Yes Yes 6?
College athletes Yes ?
Gaelic games Yes Yes ?
High school and pre-high school athletes ?
Olympic and Paralympic Games Yes 1


Standardized this page in a nutshell

  1. The [athlete] or [non-athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major amateur competition] or [major professional competition].
    1. The [athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major amateur competition].
    2. The [athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major professional competition].
    3. The [non-athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major amateur competition].
    4. The [non-athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major professional competition].
  2. The [athlete] or [non-athlete] has [won] a [significant honor].
    1. The [athlete] has [won] a [significant honor].
    2. The [non-athlete] has [won] a [significant honor].

Standardized visual comparison of sports notability

Sport 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 2.2 # of Leagues
American football/Canadian football Yes Yes 6+
Association football Yes Yes Yes Yes ?
Athletics/track & field and long-distance running
Australian rules football Yes Yes 2
Badminton

Professional sports people

American football/Canadian football

American football/Canadian football Current Version


American football/Canadian football players and head coaches are presumed notable if they
  1. Have appeared in at least one regular season or post season game in any one of the following professional leagues: the Arena Football League, the Canadian Football League, the National Football League, the third American Football League, the All-America Football Conference or the United States Football League, or any other top-level professional league.
  2. Note: Players who play in minor or semi-professional leagues (such as
    af2
    ) are not presumed notable unless they meet another criterion, such as notability arising from their college football days.
  3. Note: this does not apply to assistant coaches or coaching assistants.

American football/Canadian football Make Ugly


  1. The [athlete] or [non-athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major amateur competition] or [major professional competition].
    1. The [athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major amateur competition].
    2. The [athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major professional competition].
      • The [American football/Canadian football player] has [appeared in at least one regular season or post season game] in a [professional league].
    3. The [non-athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major amateur competition].
    4. The [non-athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major professional competition].
      • The [head coach] has [appeared in at least one regular season or post season game] in a [professional league].
  2. The [athlete] or [non-athlete] has [won] a [significant honor].
    1. The [athlete] has [won] a [significant honor].
    2. The [non-athlete] has [won] a [significant honor].


[American football/Canadian football players] and [head coaches] are presumed notable if they
  1. Have [appeared in at least one regular season or post season game] in any one of the following [professional leagues]: the Arena Football League, the Canadian Football League, the National Football League, the third American Football League, the All-America Football Conference or the United States Football League, or any other top-level professional league.
  2. Note: Players who play in minor or semi-professional leagues (such as
    af2
    ) are not presumed notable unless they meet another criterion, such as notability arising from their college football days.
  3. Note: this does not apply to assistant coaches or coaching assistants.

American football/Canadian football Standardized Version


Association football

Association football Current Version


Association football (soccer) figures are presumed notable if they meet the following:

  1. Players who have played in, and managers who have managed in any Tier 1 International Match, as defined by FIFA,[6] (including the Olympics) are notable. The notability of these is accepted as they would have received significant coverage as outlined above in the general notability criteria.
  2. Players who have played, and managers who have managed in a fully professional league, will generally be regarded as notable. See a
    list of fully professional leagues kept by WikiProject Football
    .
Note: For the purposes of this guideline, played means having appeared in a match either in the starting line-up or coming on as a substitute. Youth players are not notable unless they satisfy one of the statements above, or if they can be shown to meet the wider requirements of
WP:GNG
.

Association football Make Ugly


  1. The [athlete] or [non-athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major amateur competition] or [major professional competition].
    1. The [athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major amateur competition].
    2. The [athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major professional competition].
    3. The [non-athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major amateur competition].
    4. The [non-athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major professional competition].
  2. The [athlete] or [non-athlete] has [won] a [significant honor].
    1. The [athlete] has [won] a [significant honor].
    2. The [non-athlete] has [won] a [significant honor].

Association football (soccer) [figures] are presumed notable if they meet the following:

  1. [Players] who have [played in], and [managers] who have [managed in] any [Tier 1 International Match, as defined by FIFA],[7] (including the Olympics) are notable. The notability of these is accepted as they would have received significant coverage as outlined above in the general notability criteria.
  2. [Players] who [have played], and [managers] who have [managed] in a [fully professional league], will generally be regarded as notable. See a
    list of fully professional leagues kept by WikiProject Football
    .
Note: For the purposes of this guideline, played means having appeared in a match either in the starting line-up or coming on as a substitute. Youth players are not notable unless they satisfy one of the statements above, or if they can be shown to meet the wider requirements of
WP:GNG
.

Association football Standardized Version


  • [WP:NSPORT:1.1]: Players who have played in any Tier 1 International Match, as defined by FIFA, (including the Olympics).
  • [WP:NSPORT:1.2]: Players who have played in a fully professional league. See a
    list of fully professional leagues kept by WikiProject Football
    .
  • [WP:NSPORT:1.3]: Managers who have managed in any Tier 1 International Match, as defined by FIFA, (including the Olympics).
  • [WP:NSPORT:1.4]: Managers who have managed in a fully professional league. See a
    list of fully professional leagues kept by WikiProject Football
    .

Athletics/track & field and long-distance running

Athletics/track & field and long-distance running Current Version


Athletes who compete in the field of
Athletics
are presumed notable if they meet any of the criteria below
  1. Has competed in the
    IAAF World Championships
  2. Finished top 8 in a competition at the highest level outside of the Olympic games and world championships. Individual events in these championships must contain either several heats or extended fields (e.g. European Athletics Championships, Commonwealth Games, or any of the 6 World Major Marathons).
  3. Finished top 3 in any other major senior level international competition (this includes prestigious small field meets, e.g.
    IAAF Gold Label Road Race
    that is not explicitly mentioned above)
  4. Has won an individual gold medal at the
    IAAF World Junior Championships, or Youth World Championships
    .
  5. Has won their country's senior national championship, with the exception of those that have never been ranked in the top 60 on the
    IAAF
    world leading list at the end of a given calendar year
  6. Has won the elite division of multiple notable* road races (including the same race multiple times) or has established a history of highly competitive, non-winning performances in many notable races (at least 10 top threes)
  7. Has at any time held a world or continental record (including world junior records, world youth bests and masters age-group world records) ratified or noted by the appropriate official body
  8. Owns a mark that placed the athlete in the top 12 in the world for that calendar year in a non-relay event contested or admitted to the senior
    Olympics, or an equivalent performance over a closely matching imperial distance
  9. Has a non-relay mark listed on the
    IAAF
    senior all-time list or equivalent list
  10. Has been inducted into the National Track and Field Hall of Fame or the Road Runners Club of America Hall of Fame.

To non-athletes associated with the sport (or athletes whose main claim to notability is non-athletic activity) the following criteria of notability apply:

  1. Coaches that have coached many notable athletes, including at least one (non-relay)
    World champion
    or senior World Record holder during the time of the athletes' notable accomplishments.
  2. Coaches that have been the official head coach of an Olympic track and field team for a country with multiple medalists.
  3. Coaches that introduced a notable technique or training method, and is widely credited as the originator.
  4. Clubs that have received major international coverage for its successes and has a résumé composed of many successful Olympians over a long period of time (e.g. Irish American Athletic Club). If a club's success is mainly due to one coach, then only the coach is notable.
*The notability of a road race is determined by meeting any one of the following criteria
  1. It has an international elite (as defined by the IAAF standards for that year) field of at least 5 different nationalities.
  2. It receives broadcast or cable television coverage beyond the local market (if coverage is through the internet, the site must be independent of the sport, for example Universal Sports).
  3. It is a directly competitive meeting between several notable performers (at least 5).

The following criteria may also be used to satisfy road race notability, but does not count towards the notability of athletes who compete in these races

  1. It has been the site of exceptional performances or records (bests).
  2. It regularly has more than 5,000 competitors.
  3. It has been held over a unique course or distance consistently over a period of 25 years.

Athletics/track & field and long-distance running Make Ugly


Athletics/track & field and long-distance running Standardized Version


Australian rules football

Australian rules football Current Version


Athletes who compete in Australian rules football are presumed notable if they meet any of the criteria below
  1. Has appeared in a match of the Australian Football League.
  2. Before 1990, appeared in a match of the Victorian Football League.
  3. Is known, and has received significant coverage in
    reliable sources
    , for major individual achievements in a state football league.

Coaches are presumed notable if they have been the head coach of an Australian Football League team or, before 1990, a Victorian Football League team.

Australian rules football Make Ugly


  1. The [athlete] or [non-athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major amateur competition] or [major professional competition].
    1. The [athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major amateur competition].
    2. The [athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major professional competition].
    3. The [non-athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major amateur competition].
    4. The [non-athlete] has [actively participated] in a [major professional competition].
  2. The [athlete] or [non-athlete] has [won] a [significant honor].
    1. The [athlete] has [won] a [significant honor].
    2. The [non-athlete] has [won] a [significant honor].
[Athletes] who [compete] in Australian rules football are presumed notable if they meet any of the criteria below
  1. Has [appeared in] a match of the Australian Football League.
  2. Before 1990, [appeared in] a match of the [Victorian Football League].
  3. Is known, and has received significant coverage in
    reliable sources
    , for major individual achievements in a state football league.

[Coaches] are presumed notable if they [have been the head coach of] an Australian Football League team or, before 1990, a [Victorian Football League team].

Australian rules football Standardized Version


  • [WP:NSPORT:1.2]: The athlete has appeared in an Australian Football League match or before 1990 a Victorian Football League match.
  • [WP:NSPORT:1.4]: The coach has been the head coach of an Australian Football League team or, before 1990, a Victorian Football League team.

Badminton

Badminton Current Version


Athletes in Badminton are presumed notable if they meet any of the criteria below
  1. Participation at the Olympic Games, or World Championships,
  2. Competed in the quarter finals at a tournament of the highest level outside of the Olympics or World Championships (e.g. Continental Championships, BWF Super Series or Commonwealth Games) in teams or singles or doubles competitions.
  3. Medalist at the highest international teams or singles/doubles championships of a country (e.g.
    Slovak International
    ).
  4. Medalist at tournaments of the BWF Grand Prix Gold and Grand Prix.
  5. Gold medalist at a national teams or singles/doubles championship, for countries that regularly send athletes to the Olympics.

Badminton Make Ugly


Badminton Standardized Version


Baseball

Current Version


Baseball figures are presumed notable if they

  1. Are a member of a major Hall of Fame, such as the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum or the Japanese Baseball Hall of Fame.
  2. Have appeared in at least one game in any one of the following active major leagues:
    Olympics
    ) as a member of a national team.
  3. Have appeared in at least one game in any of the following defunct leagues: .
  4. Have served as a commissioner, president, general manager, owner, coach, or manager in one of the above-mentioned leagues.
  5. Have served as a Major League Baseball umpire on a regular league staff.

Players and other figures who do not meet the criteria above are not presumed to meet Wikipedia's standards for notability. To establish that one of these is notable, the article must cite published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. Fan sites and blogs are generally not regarded as

reliable sources, and team sites are generally not regarded as independent of the subject. Although statistics sites may be reliable sources, they are not sufficient by themselves to establish notability.[8]

Some minor league players receive some coverage from reliable sources, but not enough to satisfy the notability criteria for an independent article. In these cases, it may be appropriate to write a short, stub-length bio as a section within the article on the franchise's minor league players (for example,

WP:BLP
.

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Basketball

Current Version


Basketball figures are presumed notable if they
  1. Have appeared in one game as either a player or head coach in the original , or a similar major professional sports league.
  2. Were selected in the first two rounds of the
    NBA Draft
    .
  3. Have won an award, or led the league in a major statistical category of the
    NBA Development League
    .

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Boxing

Current Version


A boxer is presumed notable if he or she:

  1. Has fought for a world title (e.g. super, regular/full, interim) for one of the following current or historical major sanctioning bodies:
  2. Has fought for a regular/full national or higher non-world title for an affiliated organization of one of the above listed major sanctioning bodies (e.g. IBF-affiliated (
    IBU), NABF, or OPBF), or WBO-affiliated (NABO
    ))
  3. Has been ranked in the world top ten of any weight class by the IBF, WBA, WBC, WBO, or The Ring magazine.
  4. Has fought, as an amateur, in the final of a national amateur championship for an
    Medal table (2001 - present)), or have represented their AIBA
    affiliated country in a continental (or higher) tournament.

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Cricket

Current Version


A cricket figure is presumed notable if he or she
  1. has appeared as a player or umpire in at least one cricket match that is judged by a substantial source to have been played at the highest international or domestic level
  2. has appeared in at least one
    ICC Trophy
    final prior to 2005, as a player or umpire
  3. has appeared in at least one World Cricket League match of Division Six status or above since 2007 as a player or umpire
Note: understanding of what constitutes a match played at the highest international or domestic level is central to these criteria and qualification of a given match is dependent on its inclusion in a substantial source. Youth players (e.g. members of under-19 teams) are not notable unless they satisfy one of the statements above, or if they can be shown to meet the wider requirements of
WP:CRIN which should be consulted for details. Major individual matches (i.e., played outside organised competitions) are those shown to be significant, especially if historically significant, by substantial sources as outlined in Historical sources
.

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Curling

Current Version


A curler is presumed notable if he or she
  1. Has participated in a World Curling Tour sanctioned event.
  2. Has participated in a
    World Curling Federation
    sanctioned event.
  3. Has participated in
    Tournament of Hearts
    or received a podium finish for another country's national championship, provided that the country has qualified a team into either the preceding or succeeding Olympics.
  4. Has participated in an Olympic qualifying event for any country.
  5. Has participated in the Canadian Mixed, Junior or Senior championship.
  6. Has participated in a provincial or territorial playdown leading to the Brier or Tournament of Hearts.
  7. Has participated in a
    Canada Cup of Curling
    game.
  8. Has received a podium finish at a Canadian Wheelchair Curling Championship or the Canadian Masters Curling Championships.
  9. Has participated at the
    Paralympics
    .
  10. Is a member of the
    WCF Hall of Fame
    .

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Cycling

Current Version


A male cyclist is presumed notable if he:

  1. rode professionally in a UCI World Tour;
  2. rode in a Grand Tour or Monument;
  3. competed at the
    UCI World Cup
    ;
  4. won Gold at an international multi-sport event (games) (also includes races like the World University Cycling Championship);
  5. won a
    UCI category race (minimum classification 1.1 / 2.1, including Continental and National Championships
    ).

A female cyclist is presumed notable if she:

  1. rode professionally in a
    UCI Women's team
    ;
  2. competed at the Olympics or UCI World Championships or UCI World Cup;
  3. won a UCI category race (including Continental and National Championships);
  4. won Gold at an international multi-sport event (games) (also includes races like the World University Cycling Championship).

A team is presumed notable if it is:

  1. a men's road team in the 1st (UCI WorldTeam), 2nd (UCI ProContinental), or 3rd (UCI Continental) tier;
  2. a UCI team (
    UCI women's team
    , UCI track team, UCI mountain bike team, UCI cyclo-cross team, etc.)
    .

A race is presumed notable if it:

  1. is ranked with the UCI (WT, 1HC, 1.1, 1.2, 2HC, 2.1, 2.2, CDM, JO, CM, GT, CC, CN);
  2. is part of an international multi-sport event (games) (also includes races like the World University Cycling Championship);
  3. holds significant recognition (e.g,
    People's Choice Classic
    )
    .

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Equestrian sport

Current Version


This section does not encompass notability issues for individuals in

WP:NHORSERACING
.

Equestrians competing at the highest level of international competition are not always "professionals", some earn money and some do not, but most have sponsors or receive money to support their activities. Both professionals and non-professionals have been put in the professional sports category for convenience.

Individual people who are involved in equestrian sport are presumed notable if they
  1. Have participated at the
    Olympic Equestrian Events
    as a rider or official team coach
  2. Have participated at the
    Paralympics
    as a rider, driver or official team coach
  3. Have participated at the Pan American Games as a rider, driver or official team coach
  4. Have participated at the FEI World Equestrian Games (WEG) as a rider, driver or official team coach
  5. If prior to a competition becoming part of the combined WEG, placed individually or been on a team that won gold, silver, or bronze at the
  6. Have won a
    FEI World Cup
    competition.

Notability for persons associated with equestrian competition who were not notable as competitors or team coaches as outlined above:

  1. A coach who worked with many competitors considered notable by the criteria above, including at least one individual Olympic medalist or World Equestrian Games champion
  2. Individual members inducted into a major equestrian-oriented national hall of fame dedicated to sports with international-level competition, such as the United States Show Jumping Hall of Fame.
  3. A horse trainer who worked with many horses that (with their riders or drivers) competed in competition considered notable by the criteria above, including winners of at least one Olympic medal or World Equestrian Games championship
  4. Heads of national and international federations, e.g.
    Fédération Equestre Internationale
    .
  5. A horse breeder who was the breeder of record for many notable horses including the mounts of at least one Olympic medal or World Equestrian Games championship competitor.

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Figure skating

Current Version


Figure skaters competing at the highest level of international competition are not "professional" skaters, but they are also not amateurs since they do receive money. They are called eligible skaters but have been put in the professional sports category for convenience.

Figure skating figures are presumed notable if they
  1. Competed at an
    Olympics or at an ISU senior World Figure Skating Championships
    (Competing in a world championship qualifying round does not guarantee notability.)
  2. Competed in the free skate at the following ISU Championships: World Junior Figure Skating Championships, European Figure Skating Championships, Four Continents Figure Skating Championships
  3. Won their country's senior national championships, with the exception of those countries that do not regularly send multiple skaters to the Olympic Games (consult this Olympic athlete tally to check whether the country qualifies).
  4. Competed at a )
  5. Medaled at a non-Grand Prix international senior-level event (commonly referred to as "senior B" competitions, as opposed to "A" competitions, which are the Grand Prixs and ISU championships. See
    figure skating competitions for more information and List of figure skating competitions for a list of events. Notable examples of senior Bs are the Nebelhorn Trophy, the Karl Schäfer Memorial and the Golden Spin of Zagreb
    .)

Notability for persons associated with skating who were not notable as eligible skaters:

  1. A coach or choreographer who has worked with many notable skaters, including at least one Olympic medalist or senior World Champion (e.g.
    David Wilson
    )
  2. Heads of national and international federations.
  3. Individual members of the
    U.S. Figure Skating Hall of Fame
    .

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Golf

Current Version


Golf figures are presumed notable if:

  1. They have competed in the Ryder Cup, Presidents Cup, Solheim Cup or similar international competition
  2. They are enshrined in one of golf's recognized Halls of Fame (ex: World Golf Hall of Fame)
  3. They have won at least one professional golf tournament (ex:
    Champions Tour
    )
  4. They have won at least one recognized amateur golf tournament at the national or international level (ex: U.S. Amateur, British Amateur)
  5. They have made the cut in one of the major tournaments:
  6. They have competed as a professional on the PGA, LPGA, European, or Champions Tour for at least one full year
  7. They hold a golf record (ex: lowest score) recognized by the USGA, PGA, LPGA or The R&A

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Gymnastics

Current Version


Artistic gymnasts are deemed notable if they meet any of the criteria below
  1. competed at the Summer Olympics or senior World Championships
  2. won a senior individual medal at an elite international competition*
  3. won their country's senior all-around or individual event finals national championship while competing for a country who qualified a full team into the most recent Olympics or senior World Championships
  4. won an individual medal at the senior national championships for any country that medaled in the team competition at the most recent Olympics or World Championships
  5. inducted into the International Gymnastics Hall of Fame
Junior gymnasts are deemed notable if they meet any of the criteria below (females only)
  1. won an individual gold medal at the junior national championships for any of the following countries: USA, Russia, China, Romania
  2. won an individual gold medal, in the junior division, at an elite international competition*
  3. won an individual medal at the
    Youth Olympic Games
Coaches are assumed notable if
  1. they have coached many notable athletes, including at least one individual Olympic medalist or World champion
  2. they have been the official head coach of an Olympic or World Championship team
*An elite international competition is
any competition with considerable international WP:GNG coverage between at least eight notable athletes (examples of such competitions include: Pan American Games, Asian Games, Commonwealth Games, European Championships, and Pacific Rim Championships).

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Horse racing

Current Version


Notability for people involved in

WP:NRODEO

Not all participants in horse racing are athletic "professionals", particularly owners and breeders, but due to purse money and profit motive throughout the sport they are put in the professional sports category for convenience.

Horse racing figures, including horses and/or their human "connections" (horse trainers, jockeys or horse owners and horse breeders) are presumed to most likely meet WP:GNG for notability if they have accomplished any of the following:

  1. Individuals who win a Grade I/Group I stakes race or the equivalent level in their respective nations. (Horses, due to their relatively short careers, at least once; humans best to have done so more than once)
  2. Individuals who have won multiple significant Grade/Group 2 or 3 graded stakes races or the equivalent level in their respective nations.
  3. Individuals who have won year-end championship titles, such as an Eclipse Award.
  4. Members of a national Racing Hall of Fame.

Notability for horses or persons associated with horse racing who were not competitors or do not meet the criteria above may be presumed notable if they meet GNG for any of the following:

  1. Individual humans who were significant for new advancements or trailblazing achievements. (examples: Andrew Beyer, Florence Nagle, Diane Crump)
  2. Horses that may not have raced to any significant degree (usually due to injury), but had multiple significant progeny, such as Tapit.
  3. Horses who are ranked the leading sire or broodmare for a given year in their respective nations (again, see Tapit)
  4. Breeding farms or farm owners that do not race many horses themselves, but have produced or currently stand horses who became notable winners. (i.e. Adena Springs)
  5. Agents, race track announcers (i.e. Larry Collmus), racing journalists (i.e. Steve Haskin), venue owners (i.e. Frank Stronach) and other business professionals with a significant connection to horse racing.
  6. Horses and individuals involved in highly publicized thefts or other crimes, e.g. Shergar, scandals or other nefarious activities, such as substitution scams, e.g. Fine Cotton.
  7. An individual person with a connection to a notable horse is not inherently notable for that reason only, see
    WP:BIO1E, though if the individual's role is a large one, a significant connection to a single notable horse might justify a spinoff article. (i.e. Eddie Sweat, groom of Secretariat). Conversely, a horse is not presumed notable just because the owner is famous: Jim Rome owns racehorses, Shared Belief is notable, Gallatin's Run
    is probably not.

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Ice hockey

Current Version


Ice hockey players are presumed notable if they

  1. Played one or more games in an existing or defunct top professional league;
  2. Played one or more games in an amateur league considered, through lack of a professional league, the highest level of competition extant;
  3. Played at least 200 games (90 games for a goaltender) or achieved preeminent honors (all-time top ten career scorer, First Team All-Star) in top-level minor leagues or second tier national leagues;
  4. Achieved preeminent honors in a lower minor or major junior league (all-time top ten career scorer or First Team All-Star), or in an NCAA Division I collegiate hockey league (all-time top ten career scorer or First or Second Team All-American). (Note: merely playing in one of these leagues is not enough to satisfy inclusion requirements);
  5. Are a first-round draft pick in the
    NHL Entry Draft
    ;
  6. Played on a senior national team (such as at the Olympic Games or World Championship); or
  7. Are an honored member of a national or multinational hockey Hall of Fame.
For coaches or managers of ice hockey teams, substitute "coached" or "managed" for "played" in the player guidelines. Please see
WP:NHOCKEY/LA for a list of leagues at each level maintained by the Ice Hockey WikiProject
.

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Kickboxing

Current Version


A kickboxing athlete is presumed notable if they've:

Kickboxers that have an amateur background exclusively are not considered notable unless the person has been the subject examined in detail (more than a single paragraph) in several reliable third-party sources (at least four), excluding local publications.

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Mixed martial arts

Current Version


Mixed martial artists are presumed notable if they
  1. Have fought at least three (3) professional fights for a top-tier MMA organization, such as the UFC (see
    WP:MMATIER
    ); or
  2. Have fought for the highest title of a top-tier MMA organization

See also: an essay, Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/MMA notability

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Motorsports

Current Version


Motorsport figures are presumed notable if they
  1. Have driven in a race in a fully professional series. A fully professional series is one where prize money is not trivial compared to the cost of the series. For example, the SCCA Trans-Am Series is considered professional while the SCCA Spec Miata National Championship isn't.
  2. Predate the sharp distinction between professional and amateur (prior to World War II).
  3. Competed in a series or race of worldwide or national interest (for example, the
    American Championship or 24 Hours of Le Mans
    ).
  4. Have owned or been team principal for a team in a major racing series (NASCAR Sprint Cup, Formula One, IndyCar, A1GP, CART, IMSA) for a full season or more. This includes Sprint Cup
    crew chiefs
    .
  5. Have been enshrined in any notable motorsports hall of fame.
  6. Founded, owned, or managed any notable professional racing series.
  7. Designers or engineers who have been covered extensively by the media or motorsports historians.
  8. Hold or have held a significant motorsports record, such as a land speed record.

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Rodeo

Current Version


Individuals who participate in the sport of Rodeo are presumed notable if they
  1. Have participated as athletes at the highest level of professional competition such as the Calgary Stampede, Canadian Finals Rodeo, National Finals Rodeo, or National Finals Rodeo (Australia);
  2. Have been inducted into a national or international rodeo hall of fame such as the ProRodeo Hall of Fame, Canadian Pro Rodeo Hall of Fame, National Cowboy & Western Heritage Museum Rodeo Hall of Fame, or National Cowgirl Museum and Hall of Fame.
  3. College rodeo athletes in
    NHSPHSATH
    .

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Rugby league

Current Version


A player, or coach of rugby league football is presumed notable if they:

  1. Have appeared in at least one match at a
    Rugby League European Cup
    , or
  2. Have appeared in at least one match between Great Britain, England, Wales, France, New Zealand or Australia prior to 1995, or
  3. Have appeared in at least one match of a fully professional club Rugby league competition:

Other players and personalities surrounding the game are notable if they meet

WP:GNG
.

Note 1: or their earlier iterations in the UK, Australia or New Zealand.

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Rugby union

Current Version


A rugby union person is presumed notable if he or she has played for, coached or administered:

  1. a "High Performance Union" at any time(see Note 1) or another test nation during an appearance at the men's Rugby World Cup(see Note 2) or,
  2. a team in a fully professional rugby union competition since 1995 or,
  3. a team in the
    IRB Sevens World Series, Commonwealth Games
    , Olympics, or
  4. a women's national team in at least the semi-finals of the Women's Rugby World Cup.(see Note 3)

Note 1: "High Performance Unions" for men are:
United States, and Wales.[9]
Women do not have this criterion.
Note 2: Non-High Performance Unions nations that have appeared at the World cup are: Georgia (2003, 2007, 2011), Ivory Coast (1995), Namibia (1999, 2003, 2007, 2011), Portugal (2007), Spain (1999), Russia (2011), Uruguay (1999 and 2003), and Zimbabwe (1987 and 1991)
Note 3: Nations that have played at the Women's World cup at the semi-final level are: Australia (2010), Canada (1998, 2002, 2006), England (1991, 1994, 1998, 2002, 2006, 2010), France (1991, 1994, 2002, 2006, 2010), New Zealand (1991, 1998, 2002, 2006, 2010), United States (1991, 1994, 1998), and Wales (1994).

The above parameters apply to all rugby union persons regardless of professional or amateur status. A player who signs for a team in a fully professional rugby competition but has not played in any games is not deemed to have participated in a competition, and is therefore not generally regarded as being notable. Youth players are not notable unless they satisfy one of the statements above, or if they can be shown to meet the wider requirements of

WP:GNG
.

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Sumo

Current Version


Sumo wrestlers are presumed notable if they have been ranked in either the top

juryo
division. Wrestlers who have only appeared in lower divisions are generally not notable as they have not reached fully professional status.

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Tennis

Current Version


Tennis figures are presumed to be notable if they
  1. Are a member of the International Tennis Hall of Fame, either in the contributor or player category
  2. Have competed in one of the international team competitions:
  3. Have competed in the main draw in one of the highest level professional tournaments:
  4. Have won at least one title in any of the ATP Challenger tournaments
  5. Have won at least one title in any of the
    ITF Women's $50,000-$100,000+
    tournaments. Until 2007, the notability threshold shall be winning a $25,000 tournament based on the lowest payout for a men's challenger tournament in the same year.
  6. Hold a tennis record recognized by the International Tennis Federation, ATP or WTA

This guideline applies equally to singles and doubles players. Junior players are presumed to be notable if they have won at least a junior Grand slam title, have been in the top 3 of the junior ITF world rankings or can be shown to meet the wider requirements of WP:GNG.

More detailed tennis notability information can be found at WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines.

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Triathlon

Current Version


Triathletes are presumed notable if they
  1. Have competed in Triathlon at the Summer Olympics or have had a podium finish at the Commonwealth Games.
  2. Have had a top ten finish in the final
    ITU Triathlon World Cup
    standings, prior to 2009).
  3. Have had a top ten finish in an
    International Triathlon Union
    sanctioned championship event.
  4. Have an elite level podium finish at an
    ITU Continental Championship
    .
  5. Have had a professional division top ten finish at the Ironman World Championship or at the Ironman 70.3 World Championship.
  6. Have had a podium finish at the XTERRA Triathlon championships.
  7. Have won an event that has a starting pro/elite field of at least 15 male or 10 female competitors.
  8. Have set a record for a standard distance event or leg.

Make Ugly


Standardized Version


Amateur sports persons

Current Version


Make Ugly


Standardized Version


College athletes

College athletes and coaches are notable if they have been the subject of non-trivial media coverage beyond merely a repeating of their statistics, mentions in game summaries, or other

WP:ROUTINE
coverage. Examples would include head coaches, well-known assistant coaches, or players who:

  1. Have won a national award (such as those listed in
    Division I (NCAA)
    record.
  2. Were inducted into the hall of fame in their sport (for example, the College Football Hall of Fame).
  3. Gained national media attention as an individual, not just as a player for a notable team.

Gaelic games

Players of Gaelic games are presumed notable if they fulfill any of the following criteria:

  1. Gaelic footballers who have played at senior inter-county level in the League or Championship
  2. Gaelic handballers who have won at senior inter-county level
  3. Hurlers who have played at senior inter-county level in the League or Championship

High school and pre-high school athletes

High school and pre-high school athletes are notable only if they have received, as individuals, substantial and prolonged coverage that is (1) independent of the subject and (2) clearly goes beyond

WP:ROUTINE
coverage. Note that the first clause would exclude all school papers and school websites that cover their sports teams and other teams they compete against. The second clause excludes the majority of local coverage in both news sources and sports specific publications. It especially excludes using game play summaries, statistical results, or routine interviews as sources to establish notability.

Organizations and games notability

Teams

This guideline does not cover sports teams. For guidance, please see Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies).

Olympic and Paralympic Games

For details on suggested content for the above article types see Wikipedia:WikiProject Olympics/Manual of Style.

Individual seasons

Articles can be created on individual seasons of teams in top professional leagues, as these articles almost always meet the notability requirements.

Team season articles should consist mainly of well-sourced prose, not just statistics and lists of players.

Wikipedia is not a stats directory
. It is strongly recommended that those articles be redirected to the team page if no sourced prose can be created.

For college sports teams, weigh both the season itself and the sport (for example, if a US college or university's football and fencing teams enjoy the same level of success, the football team is likely to receive a significantly greater amount of coverage):

  • A national championship season at the top collegiate level is generally notable.
  • A national championship season at a lower collegiate level might be notable
  • A season including a post-season appearance (or, if there is no post-season competition, a high final ranking) in the top collegiate level is often notable.
  • For programs considered elite in a sport (e.g. Kentucky, North Carolina, Kansas, in men's basketball; Tennessee and UConn in women's basketball; Michigan, Notre Dame, Alabama, USC in football, etc.) many or all seasons might be notable regardless of the outcome (the amount written by reliable sources on a weekly basis for some of these programs is enough that almost anything or anyone having any relation to them is likely to meet the General Notability Guideline).
  • In cases where the individual season notability is insufficient for an article, multiple seasons may be grouped together in a single article. This grouping might be based on head coaches, conference affiliation, or any other reasonable standard that results in sufficient coverage for the period to warrant an article.

Individual games or series

Some games or series are inherently notable, including but not limited to the following:

Articles about notable games should have well-sourced prose, not merely a list of stats. Regular season games in professional and college leagues are not inherently notable.

For a games or series that is already covered as a subtopic in another article, consider

instead of creating a new standalone page
.

Rivalries

Sports rivalries are not inherently notable. Articles on sports rivalries, such as

general notability guideline
.

Research links

The following are some potential places to look for sources to establish sports notability:

  • Chronicling America Library of Congress, historic newspapers from 1836–1922 (free)
  • Google news search (mostly free)
  • LA84 Foundation Digital archive of the LA84 Foundation research library; digitized books, periodicals, and magazines on sports (free)
  • Newspaper archive Digitized newspapers, broad coverage (free search, paid access)
  • NewsLibrary Digitized newspapers, broad coverage (free search, paid access)
  • Newspapers.com Digitized newspapers, broad coverage (free search, paid access)

Notes

  1. ^ "Statement to exclude Esports from this guideline" discussion, October–November 2011
  2. ^ What constitutes a "published work" is deliberately broad.
  3. Internet Movie Database and Internet Adult Film Database are not considered credible since they are, like wikis
    , mass-edited with little oversight. Additionally, these databases have low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion.
  4. ^ Sources that are pure derivatives of an original source can be used as references, but do not contribute toward establishing the notability of a subject. "Intellectual independence" requires not only that the content of sources be non-identical, but also that the entirety of content in a published work not be derived from (or based in) another work (partial derivations are acceptable). For example, a speech by a politician about a particular person contributes toward establishing the notability of that person, but multiple reproductions of the transcript of that speech by different news outlets do not. A biography written about a person contributes toward establishing his or her notability, but a summary of that biography lacking an original intellectual contribution does not.
  5. ^ Autobiography and self-promotion are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself have actually considered the subject notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it. Thus, entries in biographical dictionaries that accept self-nominations (such as the Marquis Who's Who) do not prove notability.
  6. ^ "Regulations Governing International Matches" (PDF). FIFA. p. 8.
  7. ^ "Regulations Governing International Matches" (PDF). FIFA. p. 8.
  8. ^ Articles that are not sourced to published material providing significant coverage of the subject (beyond just statistics sites) may be nominated for deletion.
  9. International Rugby Board (2011). "Regulation 16". Regulations relating to the game
    (PDF). International Rugby Board. p. 151.