User:Natalie165998/Evaluate an Article
Hello
Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Which article are you evaluating?
Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I know a lot about this small artists (ROLE MODEL) and wanted to learn more. My first impression is that the page had more information than I thought it would contain.
Evaluate the article
The lead section of the article is very helpful for gaining the necessary and important facts about who ROLE MODEL is. It allows you to get the big picture in a short but detailed paragraph. However, throughout the rest of the article there is an overall lack of information. To start, in the Career section there is mention of the songs and albums he has released but nothing on the world tours he has been on. ROLE MODEL started touring in 2021 and recently finished his most recent tour "TOURx WORLD TOUR" in 2022. Another key part of information that was not elaborated on is his relationship to Emma Chamberlain. This relationship brought more people to his music because Chamberlain is a social media influencer with hundreds of millions of followers across multiple platforms. It is also shocking that there are no photos on the page at all. There are many photos of Tucker himself, him with Emma Chamberlain, and photos from his tour but none are included. The addition of photos would add a visual aspect to the page and allow for a deeper understanding of who ROLE MODEL is as a person.
For the short length of the article it does contain numerous references. Most are from independent and small websites, but the combination of these with more credible sources such as Billboard keeps the article neutral and relevant. They are also pulled from a wide range of dates which adds depth to the article as well. The time frame spans from 2016 until February of 2023 which is on the more recent side compared to other Wikipedia pages. An improvement in the Sources and References section could be made by pulling more information from recent articles and sources and adding it to the page. Key information is being missed because the dates are not within the last couple months.