User:Phlsph7/Ethics - Applied ethics

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Applied ethics

Applied ethics, also known as practical ethics,[1] is the branch of ethics and applied philosophy that examines concrete moral problems encountered in real-life situations. Unlike normative ethics, it is not concerned with discovering or justifying universal ethical principles. Instead, it studies how those principles can be applied to specific domains of practical life and what consequences they have in these fields.[2]

Photo of surgery
One of the difficulties of applied ethics is to determine how to apply general ethical principles to concrete practical situation, like medical procedures.

One of the main challenges of applied ethics is to breach the gap between abstract universal theories and their application to concrete situations. For example, an in-depth understanding of Kantianism or utilitarianism is usually not sufficient to decide how to analyze the moral implications of a medical procedure. One reason is that it may not be clear how the procedure affects the Kantian requirement of respecting everyone's personhood and what the consequences of the procedure are in terms of the greatest good for the greatest number.[3] This difficulty is particularly relevant to applied ethicists who employ a top-down methodology by starting from universal ethical principles and applying them to particular cases within a specific domain.[4] A different approach is to use a bottom-up methodology, which relies on many observations of particular cases to arrive at an understanding of the moral principles relevant to this particular domain.[5] In either case, inquiry into applied ethics is often triggered by ethical dilemmas to solve cases in which a person is subject to conflicting moral requirements.[6]

Applied ethics covers issues pertaining to both the private sphere, like right conduct in the family and close relationships, and the public sphere, like moral problems posed by new technologies and international duties toward future generations.[7] Major branches include bioethics, business ethics, and professional ethics. There are many other branches and their domains of inquiry often overlap.[8]

Bioethics

Bioethics is a wide field that covers moral problems associated with

Sentientism, by contrast, extends an inherent moral status to all sentient beings. Further positions include biocentrism, which also covers non-sentient lifeforms, and ecocentrism, which states that all of nature has a basic moral status.[11]

Bioethics is relevant to various aspects of life and to many professions. It covers a wide range of moral problems associated with topics like

Bioethics can be divided into

Photo of battery hens in Brazil
Harm done to animals is a particular concern in animal ethics, for example, as a result of intensive animal farming.

Animal ethics examines how humans should treat other animals. An influential consideration in this field emphasizes the importance of animal welfare while arguing that humans should avoid or minimize the harm done to animals. There is wide agreement that it is wrong to torture animals for fun. The situation is more complicated in cases where harm is inflicted on animals as a side effect of the pursuit of human interests. This happens, for example, during factory farming, when using animals as food, and for research experiments on animals.[18] A key topic in animal ethics is the formulation of animal rights. Animal rights theorists assert that animals have a certain moral status and that humans have an obligation to respect this status when interacting with them.[19] Examples of suggested animal rights include the right to life, the right to be free from unnecessary suffering, and the right to natural behavior in a suitable environment.[20]

global warming and how people are responsible for this both on an individual and a collective level. Environmental ethicists often promote sustainable practices and policies directed at protecting and conserving ecosystems and biodiversity.[23]

Business and professional ethics

Business ethics examines the moral implications of business conduct and investigates how ethical principles apply to corporations and organizations.

worker's rights, ethical leadership, and corporate philanthropy.[26]

Professional ethics is a closely related field that studies ethical principles applying to members of a specific

Others

Many other fields of applied ethics are discussed in the academic literature. Communication ethics covers moral principles in relation to communicative conduct. Two key issues in it are freedom of speech and speech responsibility. Freedom of speech concerns the ability to articulate one's opinions and ideas without the threats of punishment and censorship. Speech responsibility is about being accountable for the consequences of communicative action and inaction.[32] A closely related field is information ethics, which focuses on the moral implications of creating, controlling, disseminating, and using information.[33]

atom bombs
.

The

The

Military ethics is a closely related field that is interested in the conduct of military personnel. It governs questions of the circumstances under which they are permitted to kill enemies, destroy infrastructure, and put the lives of their own troops at risk.[38] Additional topics are recruitment, training, and discharge of military personnel as well as the procurement of military equipment.[39]

Further fields of applied ethics include political ethics, which examines the moral dimensions of political decisions,[40] educational ethics, which covers ethical issues related to proper teaching practices,[41] and sexual ethics, which addresses the moral implications of sexual behavior.[42]

References

  1. ^
  2. ^
  3. ^ Winkler 1998, pp. 175–176
  4. ^ Beaucham 2003, pp. 7–9
  5. ^
  6. ^ Almond 1998, § 2. Theory and practice
  7. ^ Almond 1998, § 1. Definitions
  8. ^
  9. ^
  10. ^
    • Gordon, Lead Section, § 4. The Idea of Moral Status in Bioethics
    • Dittmer, § 4a. Theories of Moral Standing and Personhood
  11. ^
  12. ^
    • Dittmer, § 3. Bioethics
    • Gordon, Lead Section, § 1. Preliminary Distinctions
  13. ^ Gordon, Lead Section, § 3a. Introduction
  14. ^ Gordon, Lead Section, § 3b. Medical Ethics
  15. ^
    • Dittmer, § 3. Bioethics
    • Gordon, Lead Section, § 3b. Medical Ethics
  16. ^
  17. ^ Gordon, Lead Section, § 3b. Medical Ethics
  18. ^
  19. ^ Holmes 2018, pp. 333–334
  20. ^
  21. ^
  22. ^
  23. ^
  24. ^
  25. ^
  26. ^
  27. ^
  28. ^ Airaksinen 1998, pp. 617–620
  29. ^ Catalano 2022, p. 17
  30. ^ Parker & Evans 2007, pp. 22–23
  31. ^
  32. ^
  33. ^
  34. ^ Braunack-Mayer, Street & Palmer 1998, pp. 321–322
  35. ^
  36. ^
  37. ^
  38. ^
  39. ^ Fotion 1998, pp. 121, 123–124, 126
  40. ^
  41. ^ Maxwell 2023, pp. 609–610
  42. ^ Boonin 2022, p. 1