User:Ritchie333/Hit and run editors
This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
This page in a nutshell: Don't make wanton changes to a page without considering first the effect it would have on the reader. |
The Hit and run editor is a stereotypical Wikipedian, who makes a large number of similar changes to pages, despite having had no evidence of any previous interest in them.
Characteristics
"Editors ... come to an article with a particular agenda, make the changes they want to the page according to their preconceived notions of what should be, and then flit off to their next victim, without ever considering whether the page really needed the change they made, or whether the change improved the article at all... Wikipedians should worry more about those who hit-and-run, and less about those who feel stewardship towards the articles they work so hard on."
Beyond My Ken, June 2008[1]
"The second is that Wikiquote often has what I call "hit and run" editors, who come, create a page that may or may not contain quotes, and then never return, leaving a messy or effectively empty page."
LrdChaos, January 2007[2]
These editors can be easily identified by large
Formatting
One area the hit and run editor gets involved in is the formatting. The
Templates
The real damage caused by the hit and run editor is with templates on
Response
The simplest response to a hit and run editor is to
If the edit really makes no difference, just let it go. If you have to revert an edit, follow the usual channels of
See also
References
- User:Beyond My Ken/thoughts
- ^ Wikiquote - User talk:LrdChaos