Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "User:Verify references" on Wikipedia
- Retired This user is no longer active on Wikipedia....11 bytes (9 words) - 01:34, 16 March 2019
- edit astronomy and transportation related articles, and I'll copy edit anything I come across. I also add and verify references when I can. WP:Astronomy...540 bytes (46 words) - 02:12, 17 April 2013
- toolforge:verify This page is a soft redirect. verify is a tool that helps with the verification of English-language Wikipedia articles by comparing information...4 KB (634 words) - 17:37, 29 September 2021
- Nowadays, I mostly verify references added to the Margaret Sanger article. Previously, I wrote the article on immunocontraception. I write original works...205 bytes (25 words) - 12:20, 23 May 2019
- VPN providers and ways to manually query and verify them. The verification methods are provided for reference; use them at your own risk, in non-intrusive...12 KB (1,409 words) - 15:09, 8 October 2022
- 'Verify Truth: ReSource, ReSearch, & Reference'...104 bytes (5 words) - 19:32, 30 July 2022
- to do Stuff I did References One of my primary activities on WP is working on references. I frequently verify and improve references on an article that...22 KB (327 words) - 15:56, 24 February 2020
- complete reference against its corresponding number at the bottom of the page, within the 'References' section. You do not need to edit the References section...11 KB (1,543 words) - 02:03, 11 December 2023
- verifiable references from reliable sources. Currently, the article has but a single reference to Amazon's extract of a review, so it is difficult to verify notability...9 KB (1,473 words) - 18:34, 28 February 2023
- Kader - improve, add links, find references United States Federation for Middle East Peace - additional references, update, revise United Nations Women's...687 bytes (44 words) - 16:39, 3 February 2017
- articles with references but not footnotes {{Nonspecific}} for unspecific references that are too broad to verify {{refimprove}} improve references {{Uncited...51 KB (515 words) - 06:51, 14 June 2024
- For a long time I've thought Wikipedia's reference requirements could be better. While newspaper references are great, for instance, there are now fewer...7 KB (1,172 words) - 10:01, 1 April 2021
- User:Joylasrado (section Good references)References (or refs or simply reliable sources), on Wikipedia, are important to verify content and inform the reader of its source. Any editor can remove...25 KB (3,615 words) - 15:44, 8 May 2022
- User:ClaudineChionh (section Reference shelf)Further reading also appear in References/Bibliography? Are there any External links that should be properly referenced in the main text? Section by section:...10 KB (787 words) - 11:46, 21 June 2024
- process of researching a topic I am unfamiliar with and then bringing those references to an article is personally rewarding, I have learned a lot this way and...8 KB (299 words) - 21:44, 7 November 2023
- sources and adding references both are similar terms Wikipedia's policies requires contributors also known as editors to add references, so that the statement...627 bytes (82 words) - 07:04, 26 July 2017
- User:Chaosdruid/templates (section Verification)article/section has no sources/references/citations given at all {{Refimprove}}, article/section has weak or incomplete sources/references/citations {{Cite check}}...7 KB (955 words) - 19:28, 20 October 2013
- worthy of inclusion. I will be looking for {{facts}} template, {{verifications}} or {{references & sources}} (especially with regards important articles)....535 bytes (59 words) - 22:22, 10 June 2012
- 2010 University of Puerto Rico Strike. - Verify all references. - Add references where needed. - Put all references into MLA/APA style. -Improve the neutrality...866 bytes (110 words) - 16:34, 11 April 2011
- area of expertise. Editors will not be required to verify their claims. The suggested verification approach is not mandated and no sanctions can be taken...5 KB (847 words) - 02:58, 18 April 2019
- Errata. Readers should bear this in mind when using the information and verify the absence of applicable errata for these articles prior to use. Our project
- such a word of advice?" To which Dr. Routh answers: "I think sir, you will find it a very good practice always to verify your quotations (references)".
- Book should be split into smaller books. See associated outline page for details. Verify: Book needs to be sighted for quality Template — Edit — Discuss