User talk : Лисан аль-Гаиб

@
Remagoxer: Thank you for your message. I just killed the job. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 17:07, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
- Thanks a lot! Shame it had to come to this, but yeah...
  talk) 17:15, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Just a heads-up, it's happened again - job #14802 this time. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 20:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Whoop whoop pull up Thank you. I just killed the job. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 22:14, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Y'welks - oh, and job #14805's having that issue now. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 23:09, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear. I killed that job as well. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 16:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back, bringing news of job #14831. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 23:05, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I just killed it. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 23:32, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...aaand now job #14834's having trouble. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 01:43, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

fixed. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 01:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx! :-) Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 01:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heads-up regarding job #14895. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 11:57, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 16:56, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jobs #14927 and #14930're acting up. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 15:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I wish this issue could be fixed. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 17:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Job #14948. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 01:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! IAbot figured this one had finished without any help from me. # 09:33, 2023-09-12 InternetArchiveBot completed bot job 14948 Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 19:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wasatch County School District (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

Please remove the external links from the body. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:37, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wasatch County School District and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted
.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:37, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amata sperbius has been accepted

Amata sperbius, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NotAGenious (talk) 05:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guardians of the North (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CurryTime7-24 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Blockquote from the studio is not needed. Without it or any useful information from reliable sources to replace it, this draft is little more than

a directory entry

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guardians of the North and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted
.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Лисан аль-Гаиб! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Union Pacific 8080 (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article

. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Union Pacific 8080 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted
.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Chesapeake and Ohio 1642
(April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Chesapeake and Ohio 1642
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted
.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Miranda Wilking
(June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Wilking Sisters. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Miranda Wilking
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted
.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Springhill, Nova Scotia

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Springhill, Nova Scotia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator

. Thanks,

talk) 17:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply

. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Ben C. Rain High School
moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to

Ben C. Rain High School

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Taxa named by Eugenio Sismonda

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isurus desori has been accepted

Isurus desori, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:44, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Bill Smith, aka Bluebird Bill

Why didn't you voice your concerns on the talk page before deleting this article? The

speedily deleted articles are not eligible under this criterion, although they may be deletable under other criteria." What alternative criteria were you using? @JalenBarks:Nigel PG Dale 16:23, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply

The information at HMHS Britannic could be added to that article. The article about Bill Smith was originally deleted as the result of a discussion at Articles for deletion. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:07, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Лисан аль-Гаиб didn't delete this article, they converted it to a Redirect which was completely appropriate. It was the recreation of an article deleted through an AFD so it was headed towards deletion until they found a way for the page to be retained in the main space. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 01:49, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since your personal attack you have edited 2 articles that I recently edited, how did you discover these articles? LibStar (talk) 04:07, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Лисан аль-Гаиб, I'm not tracking your editing habits but I did want to say please do not comment negatively on other editors in Project space. I know that AFDs can be tense areas where editors can feel frustration but please remember to be civil at all times. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Thaxterogaster artosoides
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Thaxterogaster artosoides. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:15, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thaxterogaster artosoides has been accepted

Thaxterogaster artosoides, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carcharodon plicatilis has been accepted

Carcharodon plicatilis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation