User talk:اردیبهشت
August 2012
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. AniMate 07:13, 25 August 2012 (UTC)- After looking through your contributions, your reactions at WP:NPOV. Furthermore after coming off a block you immediately returned to edit warring. Because of this, I have elected to block your account indefinitely. You clearly know how to request an unblocking, so I will advise you that should you request one, assurances must be made that you will not continue your campaign, engage in talk page discussions, and no longer edit war. AniMate 07:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)]
Request reason:
Decline reason:
I've reviewed your recent contributions, and the rationale for this block is entirely sound, and I agree with its indefinite duration. As you made no commitments to edit in a more productive way in the future in your request above, I'm declining this request. Nick-D (talk) 05:17, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Request reason:
I mentioned that i am willing to stop interacting with the other party, although they should agree to do the same by not stalking my edits. That aside, i am willing to engage in the talk page of
Decline reason:
User has addressed interaction with one user, instead of addressing broad adherence to our policies and where s/he's fouled up. I suggest reading
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Request reason:
I have explained already that i had made additions to two articles, which were referenced to academic journals (on Hazara people) and as such, those additions were not my POV. That aside, i have agreed to let that issue resolve itself through the talk page rather than edit-war, which i wont engage in. I have not, and am not here to, put forward a POV. I make updates and additions which are referenced to credible sources, and scan articles related to the projects i have joined for errors, style, and so on. Information presented in articles within the projects i have joined should be congruent with what is presented about the same topics in actual academic sources. That is my interest here.
Decline reason:
This request has been open for 10 days and it is certain that numerous administrators, myself included, have reviewed the request and declined to unblock. Therefore the response to this request is that Wikipedia is not willing to unblock your account at this time. I suggest you leave it at least 6 months before requesting unblock again. The standard offer may apply here. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:50, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Request reason:
Hi there. 6 months seems unreasonable given that i have not engaged in malicious editing or behaviour against somebody else. Disagreements in life are normal. A dispute with some of my edits were raised by only one user, while supported by others. However that dispute at
Decline reason:
You have not understood that you are blocked indefinitely for Disruptive editing: persistent Point of View Pushing and
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Request reason:
No. What are you talking about? I have not given my own opinions about anything in any article, nor is there anything controversial that i have been involved in. Regardless, since none of you own this website i will continue to edit with or without this account as i have been doing since anyway as an unregistered user. There is no reason to keep a ban on this account as i am not engaged in disruptive behavior nor am i trying to conceal anything. So i ask this last time to unblock this account so at least you people can still see a record of all my edits in one place if there is ever a need to review them, or i will just continue editing anyway like i have already been doing without this account.
Decline reason:
You do not get an unlimited number of appeals, and you have already had more unblock requests than most editors get. Your ability to edit to your talk page has now been revoked. You may contact
]If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
No.
Wait 6 months? No. I'll continue editing as an unregistered user / from different IP addresses without this account. Im not going anywhere so long as there are topics of interest to me that can be improved / kept up-to-date. Cheers! - 92.4.165.18 (talk) 18:21, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- Socking is never an acceptable way to deal with a block. Considering that you weren't on anyone's radar and probably could have quietly edited without any problem, announcing this for attention is extremely lame. AniMate 03:09, 17 September 2012 (UTC)]