User talk:北京555

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hi, 北京555, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to

talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page
, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.

However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is not in

WP:CUSTOMSIG
.

Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything. PoisonHK Sapiens dominabitur astris 15:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 北京555 (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

WP:ANEW to file a report. Bbb23 (talk) 23:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by GDP (nominal). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's

🌺 Cremastra (talk) 23:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Sorry, but it wasn’t a disturbing edit, I expect you to move to the previous edit! Now you've created a big mess in the table, this particular editor has found out about it and he edits obsessively and in a way that violates the Wikipedia rules! I will expect you to reverse the edit. 北京555 (talk) 23:47, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You totally didn’t even notice that this editor is edit only one article and violating the Wikipedia rules!!!!! 北京555 (talk) 23:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@
Cremastra 北京555 (talk) 23:47, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
You're both edit-warring, you both need to calm down.
🌺 Cremastra (talk) 00:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
I've restored the article to how it appeared before you two started your dispute.
🌺 Cremastra (talk) 00:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
But let me explain to you, I did not make an edit that is controversial or problematic, overall I arranged the table in an orderly manner and now the table is totally massed up, I would appreciate it if you revert to the previous version so that at least the table is in order. I didn't do any problematic editing. And you can check and confirm it. 北京555 (talk) 00:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@
Cremastra 北京555 (talk) 00:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
this editor is editing only one article again and again . Please check and see that my edit is totally fine but now the table is a total mess 北京555 (talk) 00:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@
CremastraI will open a discussion , but I would appreciate it if you revert to my latest version, you can check and see that it was a good faith edit, and apart from this particular editor, no one objected to it. I would appreciate it if you revert to my latest version, which you called "dispurtive" but for no real reason (I would be happy to check and see that the editing itself was good and useful ) 北京555 (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
My repeated undo of your edits to the article is problematic, but so is your repeated re-editing of the article before reaching agreement on the discussion page.
The only thing I think we should be discussing is that you should not be able to make your edits so that Taiwan, Kosovo, Palestine, etc., which used to be ranked in the table, are no longer ranked.
I think and insist that we should "keep" the previous version that cremastra has reverted to.
To avoid an editing war, I will no longer do undo. In any case, I think we should continue to keep the previous version of the article with the correct which those three countries are ranked. Minchuchui (talk) 02:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would appreciate it if you would apologize for your problematic behavior, I explained to you the reasons for the good faith editing I did
Do not edit these articels ​​again.
I also would like apologise. 北京555 (talk) 02:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
dispute resolution policy. You'll need opinions from experienced uninvolved users to resolve this dispute, and you can't do so here on this page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

@ToBeFree can I start dissection on talk page? Right now it’s doesn’t let me but it was written that I can start discussion on talk page . 北京555 (talk) 04:15, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree can you please check it out? I don’t see a reason why I can’t have a discussion on talk page(also not mentioned in the block page). 北京555 (talk) 09:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you 北京555 (talk) 12:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
battleground. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]