User talk:070time070

Welcome!

Hello, 070time070, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Article Wizard
  if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

The citation you keep adding is at best a tertiary source, and does not directly support the assertion preceding it. Please don't add it back as a reference. The citation for that paragraph already links to an article that says "Christie said he would not raise taxes", which is a far more useful citation than the one you give (which mentions Christie in passing, assuming knowledge that he does not intend to raise taxes instead of actually saying so, and mostly focuses on Whitman). --ShadowRangerRIT (talk) 18:31, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An additional note: You seem to add references primarily to this "stilltitled" website/blog. While it may be a source, it does not appear to meet the criteria for a

reliable source, and many of the references you are adding are of dubious relevance. As such you should not be using it for the purpose. --ShadowRangerRIT (talk) 18:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Aside from a couple references added to Lord Palmerston that appear to have at least some relevance, every reference you've added to every other article was irrelevant as well as unreliable. I've reverted all except for the Lord Palmerston references. Please do not add more links to this domain; given the single minded focus of your edits it is quite likely you are violating the

conflict of interest policies. --ShadowRangerRIT (talk) 18:48, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply

]