User talk:61phoenix

Hello, 61phoenix and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Go through our online training for students

If you need help, check out

Before you create an article, make sure you understand

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished!

]

61phoenix, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 61phoenix! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at

SECT (album)

has been accepted

Hi 61phoenix, I've gone through the article for this album and copyedited it to fit the Wikipedia article style... I asked for the name to be changed from SECT to Sect because on Wikipedia we don't recognise any stylisation (such as all capitals), regardless of whether the artist and their record company insist upon it. There were also a lot of apostrophes and inverted commas that had to be altered – they should all be straight apostrophes and quotation marks. For future reference, album and EP names go in italics, songs in quotation marks – see

You might find as time goes on that other editors remove some of the sources, such as the ones from Acid Stag and Life Without Andy, because they don't appear to pass Wikipedia's definition of a reliable source (see