User talk:AS92813

Welcome!

Hello, AS92813, and

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:AS92813. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:45, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--AS92813 (talk) 01:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)== Tommy Oliver ‎ == If your intention was to nominate this article for deletion, you've not completed the process - there is no AfD template on the article. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:20, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AndyTheGrump:. The article is now tagged. AS92813 (talk) 01:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked this account for evading the block I placed on 174.236.0.0/16. Please see User talk:Callanecc/Archive 9#174.236.68.115 and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dragonron. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AS92813 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

1. The range in question is for mobile phones. Run a WHOIS and you'll see the IPs belong to Verizon Wireless. #The activity reported happened nearly a year ago, IPs change hands from time to time, so there is no way to prove that activity was my doing. It only proves they originated from the same IP. #the user has a long history of warring with other editors and has recently been blocked. It's clear he'll do anything to have his way. He attempted to have an AFD deleted and was warned by
   wT:AFD

Decline reason:

QUACK! You seem to know a lot about the wiki for a brand new account, no? I'm a VZW customer as well, had the same IP for a long time. SQL^{Query me!} 09:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@

• See also warned by
  WT:AFD. AS92813 (talk) 06:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note, AS92813 has evaded his block by editing as 174.252.1.153 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 174.236.98.130 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). It is also highly likely that this user is a sockpuppet of banned users Don't Feed the Zords and BuickCenturyDriver as his only edits before this weekend were to the Survivor contestant AFDs that were frequent targets of that user in 2013.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 02:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also evaded as

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AS92813 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

if the reason for block was having more than one account, the I will choose one account and edit from that account only

Decline reason:

Oh dear, where do I start? You lied and lied and lied again about using multiple accounts, and then eventually admitted to having used 2: [1], but you still pretend it's only those two, evidently thinking we are all stupid. You use the bizarre reasoning the that one other account that you admit to was created before this one was blocked as a reason why it wasn't used for block-evasion, despite the fact that you edited with it while this account was blocked. You evidently don't have much idea what is likely to lead to an unblock. No, you have been thoroughly disruptive over and over again, and you have been thoroughly dishonest over and over again. I could easily have declined this unblock request first time, but instead invited you to make a comment on issues that gave me doubts, to give you a chance to expel those doubts. So, did you take the opportunity? On the contrary, both on this account and on another one you made yet more ridiculous and disingenuous statements that surely must have been obviously going to lead to the request being declined. The editor who uses the pseudonym "

talk) 20:32, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

In that case, there is no point in having a user account any further. It's much safer to just use an IP. AS92813 (talk) 20:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reason for the block is not " having more than one account", it is using accounts to evade blocks. You have used this account to evade blocks, and during the current block on this account you have used another account to evade that block too. I think that you had better comment on those facts if you want to be unblocked. Also, can you give a list of all the accounts you have used?

this account was created 5 months ago. Before that I only used IP. The second account Presbitow was created before this was blocked so there was no evasion. I really can't be blamed for every edit that comes from the 174.xx.xx.xx network, can I? AS92813 (talk) 16:54, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]