User talk:Ab208

February 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Geetha Govindam have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the
introduction
.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Geetha Govindam was changed by Ab208 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916587 on 2022-02-27T12:31:55+00:00

Thank you.

talk) 12:31, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Rajput (Actor) (February 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No real sources, no article.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 05:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ab208! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 05:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pradeep Rajput

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pradeep Rajput

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Ravensfire (talk) 18:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pradeep Rajput

Hello, Ab208,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started,

deletion review process

instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pradeep Rajput

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pradeep Rajput

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. CUPIDICAE💕 16:22, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Manishrajput6395 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Manishrajput6395. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ST47 (talk) 18:21, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]