User talk:Academic Challenger/Archive6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

indefinite block of 137.164.142.2

This IP is from my school, the person doing the vandalism will not change, I am requesting an indefinite block while I try to figure out who it is.

o. 06:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

User 202.138.180.33 is back

...and didn't seem to learn that vandalizing is bad http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephon_Marbury&diff=prev&oldid=92666585 ---Jackel 16:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Crawfordknights

may I ask why Barneycam was deleted. the whole point of Wikipedia is to create a knowledge database! what is wrong with adding more information! i am outradged!@# —The preceding

unsigned comment was added by Crawfordknights (talk • contribs) 02:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC).[reply
]

Das Gooch

Might I suggest that you protect his talk and user pages so he can't continue his trolling. --Wildnox 06:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Onewordpostguy

How is this vandal inactive/inappropriate to report? -WarthogDemon 05:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evading blocks

Hi. I saw you declined [1] to block the new IP account,

single purpose accounts and it will reinforce what I've written. You can also look at the lengthy discussions at Talk:Texoma and User talk:24.116.127.234
.

I don't understand -- I thought the policy was to block new accounts used by editors trying to evade blocks?

Thanks for your reconsideration -- this spammer has tied up a lot of people's time.

--A. B. (talk) 00:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whos time have I taken up? If anyone has time invested it is me. So if you have problems with editing than let someone else do it. I thought a spammer was a cheater or a fake, trying to get something for free by wrong means. Not me, I am the victim check out http://www.copyscape.com/ and see for yourself that over 77% of the content is stolen off of my website. It would be higher if I add the cities that I put on the article but that is indeed enough copied content to damage and destroy my website. Please just make it easy on everyone by adding my link or rewriting the article. That is all I ask. I am trying to work this out in a civilized manner and giving you all the chances in the world to make this right. This is costing me hundreds of dollars daily not including my business hours and being logged. One more time just make it simple.—The preceding

unsigned comment was added by 24.116.127.234 (talk • contribs
) 06:12, 14 December 2006.

Please

Wikipedia:Sign_your_posts_on_talk_pages --Hu12 14:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

User:STS01

  • Thanks for your participation in patrolling this user's edits. I believe that though some of the contributions were made in good faith, many of them are obvious vandalism (substituting "bowel movements" for "bowl games" in the Bear Bryant article, to give one example) and his repeated misuse of edit summaries to cloak his actions to give another. --Dystopos 03:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User STS01 has decided to delete all comments after they are read. You can use history to see all old comments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by STS01 (talk • contribs)

  • I just found this guideline:
    Wikipedia:Removing_warnings#Can_I_do_whatever_I_want_to_my_own_user_talk_page.3F. I will no longer revert STS01's page blanking, but I will point out that STS01 claims to have read the warnings which he is ignoring. --Dystopos 15:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • A few edits under my account such as the Bear Bryant one were done by someone else using my computer. I'll be sure to log out when not using from now on. Dystopos...your getting a bit obsessive with this issue. Time to move on. --STS01

User_talk:66.45.146.245

As posted by this user on their respective talk page:

I'm sure it would be immensely helpful to you for me to give you that information. However, I'd like you to prove that I inserted any false information into Wiki at all. Give me proof that I have done such a thing and then I will consider your request legitimized.

Here's the thing about that: You can't prove it. You can't prove it because IPs shift so rapidly that tracing anyone to any one IP is about as effective as matching a suspect to the clothes he was wearing six months ago.

Here's the second thing about that: I'd estimate twenty to fifty percent of the information contained in the Wiki to be at least inaccurate, and ten to thirty to be completely false.

Why is this the case, you ask? Because of people like you. When you edit a page from Wiki, where are you getting this information? From TLC, Discovery or the History Channel? From a professor your were lectured by last week? Your cache of personal opinions? Your imagination?

Wikipedia is simply an aggregiously over-organized version of "I read it on the Internet." It is IMHO one of the most criminal sources of information on the web, simply because it is touted as being strictly policed and fanatically patrolled by it's "user base". It is widely accepted by the common folk as a source of accurate information and is advertised as so by most media outlets.

Simply because the cops in my town are just your average joe doesn't make it any more secure than the next town. In fact, this is how the mafia gets started, politicians become corrupt, and governments oppress their populations.

Wikipedia is the precursor to Orwellian History.

Keep in mind that there are no admissions to vandalism in any of my edits or contributions, as I could very well be lying. After all, if I am that type of "scum" who would dare do such a thing, how can you trust any of my words? Paradox, paradox. User_talk:66.45.146.245 02:28, 14 December 2006 (GMT)


Thank You

Thank you for the deletion of articles that I marked. Your actions and contributions do not go unnoticed. I thank you again, good fellow.

Carlo V. Sexron 02:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron[reply]

  • No Problem!

I appreciate when Admins do the right thing and help keep Wikipedia clean! I love helping out and making this a clean, reliable source for information. There are a lot of critics about the credibility of Wikipedia, but With you I am sure that this will remain a great source of information as a public Databank.

  • Thanks Again!

Thanks again for the deletion of those two. Is there a more specific Tag I should use for speedy deletion? The only 3 I know of is Bio, Spam and Attack... Is there one for WikiCrap? That one would fit a BROAD range of things people decide to dump here.

Cheers And thank you! Carlo V. Sexron 03:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron[reply]


Vandals

Hi. Please carefully check this again [4] you will see that these weren't two posts against each other. Both myself and John Lake were posting reports about the same person (without realizing it). The person is using both an IP and a regular account. TheQuandry 05:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for your help. TheQuandry 05:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Good job cleaning it out! -- Samir धर्म 05:24, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong reports

Yeah, sorry about that something is wrong with ARV 2.1. I'll quit using it and check my monobook script. Thanks for letting me know though.--Joe Jklin (T C) 05:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate?

Is this appropriate for Wikipedia:

I am working on databasing inappropriate things on the internet. --Goluboi pider 07:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wrong the article about shock sites so people wouldn't visit them. If people google them, Wikipedia will come up first and will be warned. --Goluboi pider 07:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why aren't you letting me advocate decency on Wikipedia? --Goluboi pider 07:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B01E3D6123BF933A15751C0A964948260&sec=&pagewanted=print Return the page. --Goluboi pider 07:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See also
T 08:00, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Most the images you,
Not Censored. --Hu12 08:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Template:Terrorism in Kazakhstan

I created a Template:Terrorism in Kazakhstan based on the formatting I found in Template:Buddhism, but I'm having two problems. For some reason the space on Tem:T in K is much bigger than on the other template and "no include" is showing up near the top of the template. Could you take a look at it? I appreciate your assistance as always. KazakhPol 01:35, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I realize now that the title I was using for one of the sections - "Kazakhstani extrajudicial prisoners of the United States" - was what made it so large because it stretched. Regards, KazakhPol 06:14, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic comparative religion

I wish to nominate

Islamic comparative religion for AFD, but it appears as though someone has nominated this page in the past and the result was to keep it. I have not encountered this problem before and I am unsure of how to proceed. KazakhPol 21:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Just so I know in case I run into this problem again, how do I list a page thats previously been listed? KazakhPol 03:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the quick block, I was following him around for 15 minutes. --Nehrams2020 08:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incessant Vandalism

I need your help. Please review my comments here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Turnitin#Vandalism_by_Pakistani_Paper_Mill_Owner

Thank you - 67.188.1.224 02:35, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cell/Mobile phone ebooks

I noticed that you took out the links for wikipedians to download the ebooks straight to their cell phone from www.mobilebooks.org. The ebooks are for free. Before you took them out did you try to download some? Johnmizzi 19:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Veritas Here

I would like you to see well the comments that I am introducing and why in the white people article. Veritas et Severitas 23:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Dear Sir, I approach you upon the advice of another editor[5]. It seems that an ip address has been making disruptive edits and trolling with racist comments on several pages. The ip address is 71.106.173.12 contribs. He got blocked [6] but is presently using another ip address,71.109.183.170 (contribs) to work around it. He made one good edit to

List of countries by size of armed forces, which I reverted by mistake (see the first link where the ip scolded me for it). He pointed it out and I said sorryhere and let the matter go. However, he then proceeded to blank content from Human penis size [7] and keeps doing it. Can you intervene?Rumpelstiltskin223 05:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

First of all I've made more than "one good edit", so you are making deceptive comments. I poked fun at a user on the chat page, and I apologized for that. You are turning this into a vendetta and wikistalking me. All my subsequent edits have been valid and done "in good faith". I am not blanking Human penis size, I am making what I think are valid edits! I asked you many times to go to the TALK page, but you simply roll back my edits as you have done on multiple other pages without even seeing what they were. Of course I scolded you when you kept reverting edits; as did others. I say again you are turning this into something personal and are indeed wikistalking me now. Just go away. FYI, I didn't use another ip address "to work around it". My IP is dynamic, so when I turn off my computer it resets. Maybe you should turn off your computer sometimes too.....
So he admits to evading block. Rumpelstiltskin223 06:11, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What??? I never said that that wasn't my IP. You are completely daft. I didn't even know that IP was blocked until you pointed it out. Why don't you READ what I said. You really are a VERY SORRY individual.
  • Academic Challenger, when you come back, don't even bother wasting your time. I'm bowing out of this circus after being followed around by this baby. Maybe it makes that BBC study all the more... verifiable. o_O Bizarre little guy. Regards. 71.109.183.170 06:22, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Jewlicious" festival

Have to be honest, I was considering marking that article for deletion (as possibly non-notable) myself, but is a festival with 385 people *that* clearly "speedy" material? Fourohfour 10:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UNBLOCK 70.35.202.217

I demand that this IP be unblocked. It is an educational institution. —The preceding

Bluecord (talk • contribs
).

The new great game

Thanks for adding the categories to

The new great game. KazakhPol 08:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

24.7.77.145

Can you please put a block notice on this user's talk page? I just reprimanded them for their

Nate 11:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks!

For the revert of vandalism on my userpage :) Appreciate it! - Alison✍ 08:11, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alpental

Alpental the guidebook information is not included as an actual guide per se,(or more quotes would have been included) but as a historical example of precident setting use of public land at Alpental; which is part of the topic, and is extremely germain to the wikipedia user seeking current information about the valley. Mr Hyak has a personal beef with people he considers "treehuggers" and has continued to vandalise the entry. —The preceding

unsigned comment was added by Ullr Siffson (talk • contribs
).

Google books

I recently cited a book found on

Google books. Is it alright to cite google books? KazakhPol 05:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Languages

Hi There! Can you translate my name in what language you know please, and then post it Here. I would be very grateful if you do (if you know another language apart from English and the ones on my userpage please feel free to post it on) P.S. all th translations are in alpahbetical order so when you add one please put it in alpahbetical order according to the language. Thanks!!! Abdullah Geelah 13:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

New Year


Please Move

makati city and his international links to Makati City someone added " and his international links" to the title to spread some advertisement...

thanks!!

User:Tooj117 is back

Nevermind, another admin took care of it. Pastordavid 06:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

subst:smile3
}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hi! Why are you deleting my page?

I am editing the page Blogs Called Kamangir and I noticed that you try to delete it. Why?

Nice Work

To Member

You have deleted my topic "to member" i have teachers, friends, family, and other ask what "to member" means, because to remember don't you have to have membered first. i ask that you now delete this topic and if you do let me know why other than "assignment" because it isn't i was a question and i am doing my best to answer it. I ask that you reinstate this topic quickly as i have people i wish to show this to. please take my request into consideration it would be grealty apreciated

Why did you put Ashten back on the PBHS website?

I am a former alumni of Pretoria Boys High School and noticed you put Eugene Ashten back into the list of "Notable Alumni"... He does not deserve the credit that so many other Old Boys deserve, to say the least. I attended the school at the same time he did and he certainly does not warrant such distinction. I could name a few other very notable alumni who deserve to be up there so much more than Eugene Ashten. He was not even a prefect at that school.

Ashten

Anyone can go and create their own profile on wikipedia and make themselves "famous". I have nothing against having his name on the Pretoria Boys High School wiki, but if he is a "notable alumni", then I could go ahead and create wikis for a hundred more Old Boys that have accomplished so much more than he has. Do a search on "Eugene Ashten" on Google. Where do I see his poetry? How does this make him a "notable alumni" of having only one poem apparently published in a "journal" in 1998? The only notable thing I know of him doing right now is helping out with the Old Boys Association. If you want more reference, take a look at this website: http://www.10yearson.co.za/Messages.aspx, scroll down to the bottom and click page "2", scroll down a little and take a look at his profile. Reconsider. I think notable alumni should be reserved strictly for notable alumni. Let's not degrade that title.

Kazakh political shakeup of 2007

Deletion log summaries

Vancouver


On a side note, I'm currently undergoing an editor review. If you find some time, I would really like to hear some comments or advice. Thanks again for locking the Vancouver article. I'm sure Bobany and the other editors will enjoy the break. Mkdwtalk 02:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent speedydel of 40 Watts

Category:Terrorism in Britain

Molodzianowski

Yodas minime

Might wanna keep an eye on
TheRealFennShysa 00:25, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Mrsoups socks

Well, I'm only protecting Hayden Christiansen for now. Nishkid64 00:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, he found another way in - different
TheRealFennShysa 00:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
He's back again...
unsigned comment was added by 69.151.233.54 (talk • contribs
) 01:05, 17 January 2007.


NegotiationsI am going to make you a deal. You let me add Hayden Christensen as Anakin Skywalker on the 24 page (he will be on the show), and I will stop changing all the other pages. But if you don't let me post my information on the 24 pages, I will call all of my friends and tell them to just click random page and vandalize every page. I know that they will be very hard to catch. I know you probably don't negotiate with people like me, but think about it. It will save you trouble. I will be monitoring the page so do not change it back. That page is really the only page I want.—The preceding
unsigned comment was added by 216.61.107.24 (talk • contribs
) 01:17, 17 January 2007.

Vandal post history--Hu12 01:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AVB..... sssh

24.7.77.145Hey, I noticed you were the last one to put the block on him, so I wanted to let you know that he's picking up right where he left off as soon as the block lifted (although he same exact edits were made by other IPs in the interim). Hitting the same page TV Land as before. Dunno what the criteria is to getting perm. blocks on people, but this one has gotta be a qualifier. Tarc 16:43, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFI backlog

Naqshbandi-Haqqani Sufi Order of America

Thanks. I just came across another text dump; Usayd Ibn-Hudhair. KazakhPol 04:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

141.154.10.193

Paginationalism

I wrote an article entitled Paginationalism, which you labelled nonsense and deleted. According to a Wikipedia article, nonsense is,

"(Nonsense) falls into two categories: 1. Total nonsense - i.e. text or random characters that have no assignable meaning at all. This includes things like "903a84as42(usar(&^a", where random keys of the keyboard have been pressed. 2. Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever."[8]

I would just like to know how it fell under either of these criteria.

PaginationalismI don't see how my article was completely and irredemably confused, or how no one could make sense of it. And, even if it is a joke, as you claim, what makes your idea of a joke correct? I'm hardly advocating the correctness of the philosophy, so could I say that the article on Jesus is a "joke" because there isn't hard, documented evidence of his existence? Sorry, I don't want to seem a nuisance, I would just like to know why an article that I spent quite a lot of time researching and writing up was immediately removed. Benladen 04:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PaginationalismFirst off, I fail to see how a joke article is the same as a nonsense one. That's hardly important though, as my article is, in my opinion (seeing as humor is entirely subjective, and there are a lot of interpretations of what constitutes a joke) not a joke. It contains an element of lightheartedness, to be sure, but the entire thing I assure you is quite real, if almost unknown. My research consisted mostly of confidential interviews, which were very difficult to set up; mostly with pawn brokers and self-proclaimed paginationalists, the few that there are. I didn't get to read anything because I lacked the funds to purchase the one copy (supposedly, at least) I found at a used bookstore, which was stashed away in the back because no one knew of it, and those who did would be more than willing to ask (and, incidentally, pay an exorbitant amount of money).

Would you like me to clean up my article? Shall I take out the humor I attempted to inject into it, would that make you take it more seriously?

Benladen 07:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me

  • Oh, sorry to hear that. I thought I read "I must be visually impaired" in the first message you sent me as if it was a joke or something, but anyway is good to see that you are not letting this stop you in doing what you want to do. Anyway see Ya! Happy New year by the way.Angel,Isaac 01:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the "Hi"

Just wanted to let you know I wasn't trying to make a joke by typing "Hi" in Thaddeus Young's page. That was the first time I created a page for someone so I just wanted to type something sort just to see if it would work before I typed the real page. Sorry about that. Kinda new at this, thanks.

Wwcrdo91

Jmklooster

John Seide

Yah, it's nonsense; potentially an attack page as well. I'll watch the newpage list, see if it comes back. --HubHikari 03:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ResponseSo I'll just assume that you have no basis for instantaneously deleting my research, and move on with my life then? I really don't like to sound like such an asshole, I'm sure you can imagine what it would be like if something you took very seriously and spent a lot of time on was just blatantly disregarded by (and I can't believe I'm about to use this term) the powers that be. Benladen 00:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Linkspam

Cleanup

If I cleaned up the article would you give it a second chance, or would it just be deleted because of prior notions that you have about it?

Thanks for the temporary block!

Thanks for the assist again. That should knock that right out for a while. MSJapan 22:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete my userpage immediately!

A Man in Black

I have, but was only given those two rules given in WP:AIV. I responded back, but nothing yet. I will work with the guy, if he wants to find a happy medium. - SVRTVDude 05:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Lucca


Thanks

WTF?

Why did you delete pages titled "bandi brothers" and "gutrot" clearly they are good articles. i just need that answered. this is terrible you would even think abotu deleting them.

219.101.36.77

24.22.86.151

Hitler, Adolf (talk · contribs)

A DB Nonsense Article

Bundu dia Kongo

Thanks. Please delete Mohammed Obaidullah Alvi, which seems to be either one or a series of copyvios jumbled together. KazakhPol 03:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for puting my banstars on my user space. But I am new, how can you get to your user space?

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I Kevin Kahle 03:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Kevin Kahle give you this banstar for helping stop vandalism on Wikipedia![reply]

Can you vote for me?


No Pets Except Fish

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Academic_Challenger/Archive6&oldid=1086467151"