User talk:AdamBlack89

inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk

) 18:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC) Perhaps you should allow people to add a reference before you remove the content they’ve added![reply]

Montacute House Gardens

Hi, you have changed the image of the pavilion in ths section for one that doesn't really show anything. Admittedly both pavilions are in the frame but are barely visible. The previous image at least gave a much better idea of the construction, which is the relevant detail. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are correct, but as it shows the site of the former gatehouse and explains the original architectural context it is quite important. As it is an architectural page rather than collection of pretty pictures, I think I need to make the image larger so people can see it. AdamBlack89 (talk) 17:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a case of a pretty picture, but one that adds to the information in the text. Just making a poor photograph bigger is not going to improve it. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 17:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

A.D.Hope (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I really can’t be arsed to play with bad losers. AdamBlack89 (talk) 20:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:AdamBlack89 regarding an issue with which you have been involved. Thank you. A.D.Hope (talk) 02:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block

harassment policy. You should be aware that if you engage in any further personal attacks, sanctions of considerable severity will become imminent. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 05:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]