User talk:AdamDeanHall/Archive 1

Indeed; it's probably safe to assume that films yet to be released will be under Warners' banner. However, Warners is still keeping New Line open for genre pics and the like, so not every future NL release can be altered. In these circumstances, it's best to wait for official confirmation in the form of a useful secondary source. All the best, Steve ^{T • C} 23:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

According to the website, the title is "Can't Judge A Book By Its Cover". More importantly, the U.S. Copyright Office lists it as "Can't judge a book by its cover". — The Man in Question (gesprec) · (forðung) 20:50, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

If you want those two episodes to stay up, tell me a website and I can help make it better.- one and only,

An article that you have been involved in editing, Susan Mayer, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Mayer. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ultra! 22:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you -- it really helps.- Yours truly,

Describing Remember (Desperate housewives) as two episodes is false, if it were two episodes instead of just a two hour episode there would be a part 1 & 2. Where did you get the idea that it showed up in two parts in America? I can see a previous editor has seen you do the same thing, and I also see a long record of accusing people of vandalism and threatning to get them banned, which is also not appropriate. Yojimbo501 (talk) 22:51, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you so much for considering our point of view. I'm sorry about my previous comment (I realise it was too harsh) and I hope you can forgive me. Here's to editing together in the future! Cheers!

I'm sorry for my previous "please don't make unreasonable edits" and I see you support our side now. I still don't think it's right to tell members there banned from editing (or just editing one thing in particular), but everybody makes mistakes. Yojimbo501 (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

It's "III" and not "3" because the film itself presents it as "III". The poster is the only thing that uses the numerical number over than roman numeral.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 03:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

The irony is, Part 2 is the same way, but the opposite. The poster uses a roman numeral, but the film itself uses the numerical value.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 03:10, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

It DOES air on Spike at 1am Central Tues. - Thurs. occasionally. YOU deal with it.

You are forbidden from editing the List of Desperate Housewives episodes ever again!!! Do you hear me?!! FORBIDDEN!! AdamDeanHall (talk) 22:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

LMAO!!! Tell me something, who do you think died and made you wikiboss? Ward3001 (talk) 18:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

While I respect the fact you asked nicely,

Dude, be

Oh. I am so sorry. I deleted some content by mistake. I just wanted to add the plot tag {{plot|Article|date=May 2008}}. I don't know how that happened. I would certainly not delete content like that. Friendly, Magioladitis (talk) 13:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I know it sounds odd but I didn't remove paragraphs from the article. I just removed "last episode" since "it's not certain" according to the article. I reported the story in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:50, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Edie Britt is confirmed to be COMING BACK. Read: http://www.dotspotter.com/news/892879_Nicollette_Sheridan_s_Desperate_Housewives_Departure_Confirmed Deluxe (talk) 04:30, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but this episode will be the 13th of the season 5! You are now forbidden from editing that! Get it? Don't Change THAT anymore!

I have recently come across this edit you made to an IP a while back. I want to make sure you know that you know that you

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. It is considered rude not to use an edit summary. Edits without an edit summary are subject to being reverted or deleted. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 20:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Nick GAS maybe still on Dish until Jan. 2009 but the entire schedule been look the same since November 2005 when Pumping GAS,

Can what ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.207.180.31 (talk) 14:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

You wrote : If you can agree that the episode

So, You agree with me ??? O_O It's fabulous ! Thanks, you have understood ! It's great ! =) Because I hate argue with people ! Thanks you ! (86.207.180.31 (talk) 14:18, 17 June 2008 (UTC))

So, on the official site, on ABC, there is written "You can't judge a book by its cover" on "episodes recaps" ! So it's not "Can't judge a book by its cover" ! DOn't you think ? (14:26, 17 June 2008 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.207.180.31 (talk)

Excuse-me, but I would like to know, why do you change so quickly ? (86.207.180.31 (talk) 14:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC))

Adam, remember what we established? The official ABC website says that "Remember" was only one episode. I will have to change it back.

Disc.us.sion

05:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but it's not me who changes the episodes numbers ! (86.207.180.31 (talk) 19:14, 21 June 2008 (UTC))

I've been watching your comments on Wikipedia for quite some time now. And it's clear to me that you obviously have some kind of mental disorder. You're extremely rude to other people and seem to think that you're always right - some kind of super-human. If somebody disagrees with you, you offend and insult them and aren't able to see something from other's point of view. If someone uses an argument against your edits you don't come with an argument for your edits but just write to others to shut up like this message you have written to me:

Look, buster, get this through your head: Edie Britt is gone and she's not coming back!! OK?!! So stop editing the Edie Britt page with lies!! AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JayFS89"

I really think you should see a psychiatrist who could help you managing your disease so you could become a rational person. I also recommend you to stay away from Wikipedia untill your issues are solved. JayFS89 (talk) 22:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sick. I just misunderstood. I didn't mean to insult you with that last comment. Please accept my apologies. I take back everything I said about Edie Britt. AdamDeanHall (talk) 22:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, thank you. I might have overreacted with that "you're sick" message but I really got annoyed at you for the reasons listed above. In the future would you please consider listening to others before you just insult them and revert their edits. Thank you (: JayFS89 (talk) 22:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

FYI, I have a source. You can say what you want, but I hope you have a fun time reverting my edits everytime. Good luck!--Whadaheck (talk) 22:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

After that brief stunt I pulled, I'll be very careful not to revert anymore edits. All right? AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Sorry for keep reverting your edits. Please understand that the fact a character is a protagonist cannot rely on a short scene but for many factors. As far as I know the actor doesn't still have a contract similar to the other protagonists and there is not poster or other promomotional material to indicate that the character is a protagonist. You may be proven right but let's be patient until the next season begins. This will eliminate speculations. Remember that

You've been editing here long enough to know your posts on Talk:George W. Bush are inappropriate. Please stop trying to use Wikipedia talk pages as a forum to solicit votes for Barack Obama. - auburnpilot talk 15:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Please do not be insulted, but I tagged this stub as speculative. Bearian (talk) 21:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

On new page patrol, I've seen you create a few articles about upcoming television shows. You may want to consider using template:future television on these articles as I have done. —Latischolar^talk_{contributions} 22:07, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

A

I disagree with the proposed deletion of Saleen (Aladdin) because she's my favorite villain that I just love to hate. OK? So that's the reason why I am removing the deletion notice from the page. AdamDeanHall (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't matter if she's your favorite villian. It matters if the article has reliable sources that show it's notability. Schuym1 (talk) 08:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ghost Cat, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Cat. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

An article that you have been involved in editing, Saleen (Aladdin), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saleen (Aladdin). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

Please don't post on AfD discussion that have already been closed. Thank you. PC78 (talk) 20:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Since you have been spamming for two years:

Hello, AdamDeanHall. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Schuym1 (talk) 04:58, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 20:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Edit summary -- Seventh request

When

watchlists of users who are watching that article. See Help:Edit summary

for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. It is considered rude not to use an edit summary. Edits without an edit summary are subject to being reverted or deleted. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 21:25, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of When Women Rule the World

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log

) 15:53, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Housecat Housecall

Where did you learn that Housecat Housecall was cancelled? I read your talk page and saw you put up alot of unsourced statements and "original research" so until you link me to a reliable source I won't believe you and I'll leave the page for HH in the present tense (i.e. make it look like its on the air). Please don't put untrue, unsourced statements on my pages again.

talk

) 20:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Those sites say nothing about it being cancelled.

There's still no proof it was cancelled. Animal Planet probably just moved it to a different time slot.

I checked the Animal Planet website for a different time slot to the show Housecat Housecall. There is no different time slot for that show. I checked twice just to make sure. Good Dog U will air Saturdays at 9AM/8AM Central and It's Me or the Dog will air Sunday mornings at 7AM/6AM Central only on Animal Planet. AdamDeanHall (talk) 15:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

You haven't presented any solid evidence of that so I'm not going to believe you. Stop making up things. Go watch The Sci Fi channel.

You mean

SCI FI, don't you? AdamDeanHall (talk

) 15:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

ya whatever. Until the Animal Planet site explicity states "we have cancelled Housecat Housecall", I will continue to not believe you. They re-arrange the schedule all the time. Season 2 is probably in production and they haven't picked a time slot for it yet.

24/7

Not a single one of thise cites pass

WP:V.«»bd(^speechify _BOLO

) 13:28, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Removing tags and templates

Please do not remove legitimate "citation needed" tags from articles, as you did here. It is considered

vandalism. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk

) 16:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

SHUT UP !!!

YOU'RE VERY SILLY TO CHANGE EPISODE NUMBERS WHENEVER !!! IT'S OUR BUSSINESS ! NOT YOURS ! GOD !!!! WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO GIVE UP THAT ??? WE'RE RIGHT ! OK ??? AND YOU ARE VERY STUPID BECAUSE SEASON 2 HAS 24 EPISODES !!! SO, THERE IS 87 REGULAR EPISODES NOT 86 !!! WHEN ARE YOU UNDERSTAND THAT YOU'RE WRONG !!! I'M NOT THE ONE WHO TRIES TO CHANGE THE EPISODE NUMBERS BUT I WON'T DO LIKE THEM ! OK ? YOU WANT TO PLAY ? OK ! WE'LL PLAY TOGETHER ! BUT I SWEAR YOU THAT WIKIPEDIA AND YOU, IT'S OVER ! I'LL TELL AT AN ADMINISTRATOR THAT YOU ARE SELFISH AND IT'S NOT POSSIBLE TO WRITE IN DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES' PAGE WITH YOU !!! IT'S OVER !!! AND ALL THE MEMBERS WHO AGREE WITH THE 24 EPISODES OF SEASON 2 WILL DO SOMETHING ! IT'S SURE !!! IT'S THE END OF YOUR DAYS ON WIKIPEDIA !!! STOP ADAM ! STOP ADAM ! STOP ADAM !!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.49.9.32 (talk) 22:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Please do not tell me to shut up. I just misunderstood about the number of episodes of Desperate Housewives. I apologize for my outburst. And please don't tell the administrator about me. OK? AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Ok. Sorry for my last message but you make me angry ! And I'm not the only one ! So, what I said it's justified beacuse you have to understand that you was selfish for a long time ! So, a lot of people was very angry against you ! I know I'm not a member of wikipedia but I must tell you what a lot of people wanted to say about the episodes numbers of wikipedia ! Now, we hope you're understand and don't remember that wikipedia is not a website which you are alone ! I don't tell anything to an administrator. Bye 81.49.9.32 (talk) 17:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.203.118.59 (talk)

September 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Disney XD. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Please stopping adding the Incredible Hulk to the Disney XD without also including a reference from a reputable source that this is going to be the case. The rest of the planned shows are taken from sources given in the article. KelleyCook (talk) 15:05, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Ownership

ur acting like u own the article

WP:OWN on for size.--72.186.90.174 (talk

) 22:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

[3] - In future, do not change it pretending that you know it when you clearly did not. Having watched SmackDown!, I knew it wasn't "I Dare You". In my view, your actions were a violation of

WP:OWN as the above IP said. D.M.N. (talk

) 07:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Desperate Housewives (season 5). Due to your history of reverting to unsourced info, you are in jeopardy. Please ADD reliable sources. Ay ^{(Reply!,Contribs!}

) 20:08, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. A _talk

18:27, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mirror, Mirror (Desperate Housewives)

I have nominated Mirror, Mirror (Desperate Housewives), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirror, Mirror (Desperate Housewives). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. A _talk 23:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC) A _talk 23:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Please don't delete Mirror, Mirror (Desperate Housewives). Please leave it alone. All right? AdamDeanHall (talk) 13:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Unless you find genuine sources, it fails our policy. A _talk 21:03, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

I've included the source in Mirror, Mirror (Desperate Housewives). Now will you please remove the episode from your Articles for Deletion list? Thank you very much. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

See the discussion page. A _talk 21:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Which discussion page? I don't see it. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Please stop it; the article was meant for deletion, and its been decided it doesn't follow any policy. A _talk 20:55, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

AdamDeanHall, please do not re-create material deleted as a result of an AfD, without properly addressing the concerns that led to its initial deletion. Most likely, it will be deleted again, and if you continue to re-create the page without a justified reason to do so, creation protection might be necessary. Cheers, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 20:58, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

I find it hard to believe that you would delete the Desperate Housewives episode "Mirror, Mirror". This episode is on ABC this Sunday, so would you please recreate the page yourself so that I don't have to interfere? Please let me know right now. Thank you. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Just because the subject exists doesn't mean there has to be an article on it. Also, what do you mean by "interfere"? –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 21:16, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, believe it buddy because even though it airs THIS Sunday, it fails several policies and no one vouched to save the article but you. Sorry, A _talk 21:18, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

That depends; if, after it airs, it becomes notable add receives significant coverage from third-party, reliable sources, re-creation might be warranted. However, I'm hardly familiar with the subject at hand, so you might want to ask someone else about this episode's notability. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 22:21, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

On a seperate note, I find it alarming the amount of warning signs/AFD notifications/general warnings on this page. D.M.N. (talk) 21:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

What do you want me to do with the amount of warning signs/AFD notifications/general warnings on this page? AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Have you considered archiving some of them? –

talk

) 15:43, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Would you please show me how to archive the amount of warning signs/AFD notifications/general warnings right now? AdamDeanHall (talk) 19:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

See Help:Archiving a talk page. D.M.N. (talk) 19:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC)