User talk:AeolusQuartet

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Aeolus Quartet has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove

guidelines for external links

, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.

If you were trying to insert an

external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Aeolus Quartet

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Aeolus Quartet, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Self-promotional piece that does not establish notability per
WP:MUSIC
.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Conflict of interest

conflict of interest

.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not

Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]