User talk:Aidengregg

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Aidengregg, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions

. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page

, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --PeaceNT (talk) 16:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Aiden.JPG

Thanks for uploading

here

- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Wikipedia:Image use policy
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

I noted the changes on Self-esteem and your note on the talk page. Perhaps it makes more sense to work on a few articles at once, instead of all students trying to edit the same article at the same time. Just a suggestion. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:19, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Raison oblige theory

Article Wizard

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 15:16, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:AidenGregg.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:AidenGregg.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

48 hours after 15:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of
Academic psychologist
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Academic psychologist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academic psychologist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 09:20, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

neuromorphic computing

what are your thoughts on the role of

neuromorphic computers in the study of psychology/neuroscience? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJJ4y7 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply

]