User talk:AirmanKitten203

How should I start?

Welcome!

Hi AirmanKitten203! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ElusiveTaker^(talk) 14:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) AirmanKitten203 (talk) 14:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Hi, I noticed your contributions to fighting vandalism and thank you for that. Your recent reports to Wikipedia seem to be from users with two or less edits. Please report only if they have been sufficiently warned and/or if they have vandalized past 3 or 4 edits.

Again, thank you for your contributions to protecting Wikipedia from vandals

𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators:

IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:29, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@HJ Mitchell: FYI.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:32, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AirmanKitten203 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was unaware that what I was doing was abusive. I deleted something from a talk page that I posted in the wrong category. I love fighting vandalism and hope that I can go back to helping fighting it again soon. I see that it says I am a sock puppet but that account I have not heard of. The IP has the IP of a school. It must be another user with that IP in this school.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read

Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is not a matter of just sharing an IP with schoolmates;
your behaviour is indistinguishable from your other accounts. If you were just another student on the same IP, I wouldn't keep finding your new accounts.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:36, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]