User talk:Akkari574

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Replaceable fair use File:The Hon. Michelle Rempel Official Parliamentary Portrait 2015.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Hon. Michelle Rempel Official Parliamentary Portrait 2015.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to
    Di-replaceable fair use disputed
    |<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 10:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Larissa Waters Senate Portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading

here
- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 07:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Andrew Bartlett Senate Portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading

here
- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 07:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Senator The Hon. Scott Ryan Portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading

here
- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:00, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

permitted conditions
then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant
    copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale
    .

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:41, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Sue Lines Senate Portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading

here
- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

permitted conditions
then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant
    copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale
    .

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Whpq (talk) 13:47, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

A tag has been placed on

permitted conditions
then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant
    copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale
    .

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Whpq (talk) 13:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

A tag has been placed on

permitted conditions
then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant
    copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale
    .

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Whpq (talk) 13:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

A tag has been placed on

permitted conditions
then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant
    copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale
    .

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:35, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

A tag has been placed on

permitted conditions
then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant
    copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale
    .

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:38, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Uploading copyrighted images

Please stop uploading copyrighted files from the Senate site. These are not freely usable and they are not, as you keep claiming, CC-BY 4.0 licensed, which is verifiable by anyone who actually clicks the link you cite to their copyright page. If you continue to upload copyrighted files, you may be blocked from editing. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edits

@Akkari574: I would like to give you some feedback regarding your recent edits to former Alberta Premier Rachel Notley's article.

Typically, opposition leaders in Canada do not receive the style "The Honorable". It is true that Jason Kenney used the style during his tenure as opposition leader, however he did not gain that style from that particular position. Kenney is a former federal Cabinet Minister, and therefore is a privy councillor. Privy Councillors are entitled to be "The Honourable" for life.

As far as provincial politics go, the only figure to hold the style of "The Honourable" for life is the Lieutenant-Governor. Moreover, the Speaker, Premier, Government House Leader, and Cabinet Ministers use that style while in office only.

Please refer to this article to look at typical convention to see which officeholders keep their styles after leaving and which do not.

Thank You, Brycecordry (talk) 19:26, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"The Honourable"

In Canada, one is accorded the style "The Honourable" for life if one becomes a privy councillor (eg federal cabinet ministers, Supreme Court justices, occasionally federal opposition party leaders, depending on the circumstances, and some others, including members of the Security Intelligence Review Committee. Sometimes a provincial premier is sworn into the privy council either because of a major event - such as the centennial of Confederation in 1967 or the patriation of the Constitution in 1982. Provincial premiers and provincial cabinet ministers are allowed to use the style "The Honourable" only while they are in office, unless they are also (or subsequently become) a privy councillor so generally provincial premiers and provincial cabinet ministers lose the style when they leave office. See The_Honourable#Canada. CosmosCagoul (talk) 00:58, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]