User talk:Akraj

License tagging for Image:Madhura syrup.jpg

Thanks for uploading

image description page

indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Wikipedia:Image use policy
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Nandini's photo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading

image description page

.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Provide a source for Dr. Nandini's picture

This picture is scheduled to be deleted on Feb 15th. You must say where you got the picture. Jccort (talk) 15:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took the photo myself. Nandini is my wife. Thanks.

I will create Dr. Nandini's Profile

I have created about 50 Different notable UF Alumni. I would be more than happy to create a page for your wife. She is one of UF's most prestigious Alumni. Also could you change the copyright status of her picture. If you do not an Administrator will delete the picture. Thanks! Jccort (talk) 18:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a ton. I will be delighted to send you any information you need.Anil K Rajvanshi 12:08, 10 february 2008 (IST)

Decided to leave Wikipedia

I am thankful to some of the editors for blocking my edits. You have helped me to leave Wikipedia. I am really sorry to say that it is now controled by some adminstrators who do not understand the subjects and in a delinquent way keep on deleting edits without knowing the importance or the value of them. Removing some of them on editorial grounds are fine but wholesale removal of sites and links just because they are peeved at somebody is a sign of great danger for the future of Wikipedia. There are quite a number of editors who are in teens and wield enormous power.

All the best and goodbye. Akraj (talk) 10:59, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Madhura syrup.jpg

talk) 05:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Gaius Cornelius (talk) 16:58, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akraj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to appeal to unblock me as an editor. Through various exchanges with very reasonable editors I have learned some valuable lessons on editing Wikipedia and would therefore like to contribute to the process of knowledge. There have been misunderstandings in the past and I think I will try not having them in future. I do believe with my knowledge of the subject matter in renewable energy and sustainable development, I should be able to contribute to Wiki quite actively.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our

BWilkins ←track) 09:35, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Akraj: I do belive that you have learned some painful lesons regarding Wikipedia. The reviewing administrator (which will not be myself) needs to understand that you understand what has gone wrong and that it will not happen again. In the first instance you need to address the issue for which you were blocked: "Abusing multiple accounts: harrassment under other accounts". You will also need to address, at least in general terms, the apparently well-founded concerns that Ckatz raised on my talk page. Any of us may take a wrong path sometimes, but Wikipedia does offer this mechanism for getting editors back onto the straight and narrow. I trust that your desire to edit comes from the best of motives, but some frank self-examination is required. Gaius Cornelius (talk) 16:27, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]