User talk:Alexander.Hainy

Welcome!

Hello, Alexander.Hainy, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

As for your user page, you don't really need anything at all. Or you can add notes on what subjects you may be interested in working on here. Generally it's more worthwhile to describe your Wikipedia interests than what you may do elsehwere. Again, welcome. Fan-1967 20:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You deserve this:

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For contributing immensely to the article Al-Kindi. Jidan 23:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A'ufwan (you are welcome), but you deserved it! Jidan 19:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I skimmed through it and found it very good. When it comes to Philosophy, I am clueless. I wanted some time ago to add his scientific accomplishments, which are very intersting, but simply didn't find the time. Did you know for example that al-kindi is the father of cryptanalysis? [1] Jidan 20:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunatly, all I have is google. One very good website is this http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/kindi/index.html. Jidan 12:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alexander, no problem. BTW, I am planing on adding more on his science accomplishments this evening, can you delay the submitting of the article for a peer review at least till tomorrow? Thanks. Jidan 11:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alexander. Good effort in that article. Please see the article's talk page for a small issue. By the way, the barnstar above is the E=MC² barnstar, not the Tireless Contributor Barnstar, so you might wanna change that. Cheers. :-) ← ANAS ^Talk? 12:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mention it. I am done. Please see the talk page. ← ANAS ^Talk? 13:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Glad to help, Alexander. Good luck improving the article. :-) ← ANAS ^Talk? 16:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just added some info regarding his notable accomplishments in science. I am sorry I couldn't do it earlier, I am really busy in real life ;( Jidan 00:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Thank you, same thing to you! BTW, I read the comment above by ANAS, as far as I know, the E=MC2 barnstar is for contributions regarding to science, and the Tireless Contributor Barnstar, is as the name says, for tireless contributions. Now, since you were editing a science related article,and tiressly, I thought a combination of both, the E=MC2 star and tirelss Contributor title were right. Also, I don't know of any standards for barnstars (checkout for example the barnstars this guy has [2]. In any case:

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For contributing immensely to the article Al-Kindi. Jidan 23:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jidan 00:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and oh yeah, you can submitt it for reviewing if you want. Jidan 00:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WOW...thanks man for the barnstar!! Jidan 01:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing a great job alex. Jidan 19:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I used the automated peer-review and this is what came up, you can work on these.

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
  [?]
• See if possible if there is a
  [?]
• If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
  [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 17 additive terms, a bit too much.
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• Avoid using contractions like: hadn't, wasn't.
• As done in
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Goodluck with your goal M3tal H3ad 04:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate your effort at

Thanks for your message; no hard feelings. If you too think that this dislike of the normal transliteration is unwarranted, it's not too late to reverse it. I'm about to go to bed, but I'll get back to you tomorrow. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 00:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks as thought he discussion is now under way at the article's Talk page. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 13:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over a

An editor has asked for a community reassessment of this article to see if it still meets the