User talk:AlexandraMayers

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 08:57, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monica Foster

The article

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Monica Foster, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see

I have nominated Monica Foster, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica Foster. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tabercil (talk) 23:15, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your comment on my talk page and I just had to laugh. No, I do not have an agenda against adult entertainers. Let me point you to a few things:

1. The
   Wikipedia:P*#Active\list of active participants in Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography
2. The permission statement I got from Luke Ford way back when he was operating lukeisback.com for his photos, the bulk of which are porn stars.
3. The images I got from Xcitement magazine which are present for use on Wikipedia.

I think that's enough said. Tabercil (talk) 03:41, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ma'am, besides the above I'm an administrator, that means I'm supposed to be maintaining order and enforcing the rules. One of these rules is Wikipedia's requirements about

notability; if an article is deemed by the Wikipedia community as being non-notable, then it is supposed to be removed. That was why I nominated the article about Monica Foster for deletion, so the Wikipedia community as a whole can debate whether the subject is notable by our standards. And I might also point out that you are in a conflict of interest with regards to your own article - see Wikipedia:Autobiography. Tabercil (talk) 03:56, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

And just to let you know, I moved your comment from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priya Rai to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priya Rai (2nd nomination). The first one is a long-closed debate which caused the article to be deleted the first time, and I believe it's the second one which is the current one which you had intended to vote on. Tabercil (talk) 04:34, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Monica foster 2009a.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ww2censor (talk) 05:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi AlexandraMayers! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 00:59, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply ]