User talk:Alexjohnc3

This user may have left Wikipedia. Alexjohnc3 has not edited Wikipedia since 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

Archive 1 (June 2005 to January 2007)

And thank you for your kind comments --Michael Johnson 12:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You nominated the category Haruhiist Wikipedians for deletion on November 3rd and it got deleted, which is fine by me. It just would have been nice if you left me a comment on my usertalk page telling me you had so I could redirect the category on the Haruhiism userbox Category:Wikipedians_who_like_The_Melancholy_of_Haruhi_Suzumiya. :P --Alexc3 ^(talk) 00:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that this edit's summary listed a link to the discussion. - jc37 (talk) 12:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know that, but I wouldn't have been aware of that edit except I happened to check here and noticed that my userbox had been edited. If I made a few more edits, it wouldn't have even shown up. --Alexc3 ^(talk) 03:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I can't help you. If you created an account and didn't immediately edit with it, only a techie could tell you when your account ended up in the database, and that's probably nothing anyone busy keeping this thing running wants to waste their time figuring out for you. I guess you could ask at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) for more info.

As to your other point, my main dismay with the

I've simply seen too many articles about small political groups or even individuals teeter towards being bloated with dueling press release-type referenced material that simply doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. This is a case in point, in my opinion. Simply because a certain organization's opinion on some topic has been referenced by a reliable source doesn't make their every opinion about everything under the sun notable. I agree that

WP:SOAP isn't as explicit in this regard as I myself would like, and I've been lax on generating consensus on a policy spelling that out more fully, but using primary sources in a he said/she said manner is exactly what that policy is meant to address -- that is, in essence, the meaning of propaganda. Anyway, I'm too busy IRL -- I'll come back to this in July I imagine.... -- Kendrick7^talk 02:06, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Well I thought I found the answer to the join date question, having found my own logged here.[1] But, I checked, and you didn't show up in a search oddly enough. -- Kendrick7^talk 18:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Acalamari 09:47, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful in the future when requesting the deletion of a transcluded template. When you requested deletion of User:Alexjohnc3/Userboxes/user age you did not use noinclude tags. Your CSD tag requested deletion of the 8 pages where the template was transcluded. Monty₈₄₅ 03:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I merely followed the advice of

WP:GD#Pages in user space. --Alexc3 ^(talk) 04:46, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Pls support my work on Wikipedia and elsewhere. KannanSivaram (talk) 05:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]