User talk:Alexnally
When communicating with this user, it is further appreciated if you:
|
Welcome!
Hello, Alexnally, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
- Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizardif you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
- The Signpost, our newspaper.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Discretionary sanctions notice
Greetings! The details of the following message probably won't mean much to you as of right now, and that's okay. But as you seem to be interested in politics, I wanted to let you know that articles regarding American politics are subject to what we call discretionary sanctions (DS for short). It basically just means that attacking other editors is less tolerated, and if someone challenges one of your edits, you have to discuss it with them before re-instating it (see Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for more info on that). It can be a tricky area, so if you have any questions about DS or anything else, please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Best wishes and happy editing! —Compassionate727 (T·C) 21:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The
- Thank you, I may very well have to consult you on some thing/admin topics as I am new to this! Alexnally (talk) 21:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Feel free! Before you read too many of the links in that message, I should just let you know not to be too intimidated. DS exist because certain topic areas, such as American politics, often attract trouble editors pushing strong POVs, attacking other editors, and otherwise causing loads of trouble for us sensible folk. I'm sure you can imagine. It's basically just easier to deal with those types of editors when admins have broad powers to sanction them. In general, sanctions on Wikipedia are of a preventative, not punitive nature; you shouldn't expect to be punished for a mistake (even a "serious" one) unless we have reason to believe that you'll do it again. It's not like a single mistake makes much work for anyone or causes monumental disruption (unless, of course, you delete the main page). As long as you are willing to own up to your mistakes, you can carry on normally without expecting any trouble.
- Incidentally, I'm honored you've seen fit to use one my templates. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 22:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Feel free! Before you read too many of the links in that message, I should just let you know not to be too intimidated. DS exist because certain topic areas, such as American politics, often attract trouble editors pushing strong POVs, attacking other editors, and otherwise causing loads of trouble for us sensible folk. I'm sure you can imagine. It's basically just easier to deal with those types of editors when admins have broad powers to sanction them. In general, sanctions on Wikipedia are of a preventative, not punitive nature; you shouldn't expect to be punished for a mistake (even a "serious" one) unless we have reason to believe that you'll do it again. It's not like a single mistake makes much work for anyone or causes monumental disruption (unless, of course, you