User talk:Alizamauzy

Hello Mr Ollie. It may seem you so because I made edits for anonymous group. The edits were made for it as the name of the page and website were similar. I am not involved in any sort of paid advocacy. Had it been I would have disclosed it. I removed the COI template as the page was not edited for months and it was edited by only established editors. I abode by Wikipedia terms and conditions and do not indulge myself in black hat black-hat SEO.

Please stop adding inappropriate

Hello Alizamauzy. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alizamauzy. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Alizamauzy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Feoffer (talk) 07:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PAID, WP:Verifiability

and also shows that you have used outdated articles published before the court outcome and removed referenced content eg she was found not guilty and added sentences with no references to vandalise this page. Most of the edits are attacks on my edit for unknown reasons. It seems people are paid to revert the genuine edits made by me based on in-depth research. Aliza Mauzy 12:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 18:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)