User talk:Amerrycan Muslim

Please read and understand Wikipedia's harassment policy, particularly the section about posting of personal information of other users. This is not considered acceptable behaviour on this site. Should you do this again, you will be blocked from editing.

Please also read our editing policies, especially

Hi Risker user:Risker, thanks for the advice. Is there a step prior to arbitration that I should look into regarding the deletion of cited sources on the page of Rabee Al-Madkhali? Strangely, anything that doesn't fit with one person's narrative is being deleted. Thanks for your time. Amerrycan Muslim (talk) 05:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree with my edits, User:Amerrycan Muslim, then the first step is Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. I'd also like to remind you of Wikipedia:No personal attacks again, as constantly accusing another user of POV pushing within only two days of account creation, in addition to your hinting at Wikistalking my edits on other articles as you did here, can cause others to suspect bad faith behind your edits. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice User:MezzoMezzo. I call it doing my homework, not stalking. So, because I am new I am not allowed to do to you what you do to me? Interesting concept, that. Amerrycan Muslim (talk) 05:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, it isn't based on what you or I call it, it is based on the site's harassment policy. Please review

WP:WIKIHOUND - I took a look at your talk page here due to two attempts at outing me as well as personal attacks. That is normal. Creating an account to study the edits of another user isn't. It will be clear if you check out the link. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MezzoMezzo (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think anybody is really taking an interest in our discussion at ANI. You had mentioned 3DO; do you want to take it there next, or give the talk page another try first? I looked over your new suggestions and some of them are good. We could start there, or leave it and try to get mediation on disputed issues first. I can agree to whichever way you prefer to start, as the article isn't progressing currently. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:43, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, let's make another attempt on the talk page. Amerrycan Muslim (talk) 09:21, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dawud Burbank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Small Heath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

جزاك الله خيرا كثيرا على علومكم و مساهماتكم النافعة في ويكيبيديا و شكرا. ibensis (What’s the Story?) 18:31, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Amerrycan Muslim,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Abdul-Ghaffar Hasan Al-Hindi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Amortias (T)(C) 23:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]