User talk:Amosjo

Welcome!

Hello, Amosjo, and

welcome

to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- JHunterJ 17:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Edit summaries

When

editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary

for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. -- JHunterJ 17:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zombie apocalypse

Hi there! Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to thank you adding some

Wikipedia:Help Desk. Cheers! —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 23:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Neo-Gothic art movement

speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Neo-Gothic art movement fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Does not assert notability, and the term seems to be a neologism - some guy writing a manifesto on a website does not make it an art movement. We already have goth subculture to cover this movement, including associated art.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Neo-Gothic art movement, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Neo-Gothic art movement itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Lorna Simpson

The

systemic bias. Thank you for starting the stub. Feel free to come by and add more or make suggestions. --Knulclunk 04:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

AfD nomination of
Pyroterrorism

Pyroterrorism during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. • Lawrence Cohen 05:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Pyroterrorism

A {{

db-author}}. --stephenw32768^{<user page><talk>} 15:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button

located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 15:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Reply

Of the 5 sources currently found in

WP:RS

), and 2 of them do not use the term at all. So, the article has one source, you will have to find more than that if you want the article to be kept.

Also, a neologism simply means it is a recently coined term. Obviously, even for a recently coined term, there will be some small number of uses. However, that does not justify an article. What is there to say about pyroterrorism that won't fit into either arson or terrorism? Johntex\^talk 04:55, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Our normal policy, if one disputes a deletion, is not to simply re-create the article, as you have done. Instead, it is to take the article to Deletion Review. I have taken the article there for you; please join in the discussion [1] if you wish. Best, Johntex\^talk 05:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pyroterrorism DRV

An editor has asked for a

pyroterrorism. Since you were substantially involved in contributing to the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jreferee t/c 15:28, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Never mind. I see that you already received a notice. -- Jreferee t/c 15:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Neo-Gothic art movement

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Neo-Gothic art movement during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. freshacconcispeaktome 17:21, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Additions of http://.arthistoryarchive.com/

Adsense pub-8371900312485223

Accounts

Amosjo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Govontario (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia. --Hu12 (talk) 04:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]