User talk:Annika59

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbritti were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Many of these sources are not fully

independent of the subject, meaning they fail to contribute to notability. Other sources appear promotional, such as the press release (which can be used to derive information but not to establish notability). The subject may be notable, but additional reliable sources

are needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:April Showers (entrepreneur) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 06:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Annika59! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbritti (talk) 06:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

You are right it is disappointing :( however, thank you very much for your invite to the Teahouse and other links. I will definately go through them. Thanks. Annika59 (talk) 21:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove tags, like you did in this edit, without resolving them. In that edit, you removed the tag "refimprove" without actually improving the article's sourcing. Please take note next time. Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 16:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

O... I am really sorry. I fixed the tone, so I removed the tag. Thank you for notifying me. This will not happen again. Thank you. Annika59 (talk) 19:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete references only because they contain dead links, as you did here, because this can harm the verifiability of the article. See Wikipedia:Link rot for details on how to better deal with them. Practically, such links can mostly be tagged as dead, or better, replaced with updated or archived versions. In a nutshell: Steps may be taken to reduce or repair dead external links. Do not remove citations simply because they have URLs which no longer work. Happy editing and keep up the good work! Turtlecrown (talk) 08:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you a lot @Turtlecrown. I didn't know about the WP:Link rot. I will learn it and incorporate it in my edits. Thank you so much. Annika59 (talk) 18:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Turtlecrown I have restored one of the links and while searching, I did find another one, so I have referenced that as well.

Thanks a lot. For if you won't have mentioned it, I would have not contributed better. Thank you. Annika59 (talk) 19:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:April Showers (entrepreneur). Thanks! JSFarman (talk) 04:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Misty Blues. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 06:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]