User talk:Anss123

“It’s rear to see…”? I’m not sure what “rear” means, but I think I agree with you. I’m trying to address this issue here at

I’m gay? Cool. Learn something new every day.--Anss123 (talk) 16:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Thanks for your edits. It's good to see a few other people taking an interest in that page. Jeh (talk) 23:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thanks :) Not that I added much. If you wrote that page, good work.--Anss123 (talk) 23:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I recently heavily revamped the "history and terminology" section up through the "parallel ATA" heading, and I did the original versions of the "master and slave clarification" and subsequent sections through "one operation at a time", though most of those were reworded by someone else a little while ago. I've also been defending the page against erroneous information, which is why I noticed your edit so quickly. Related to that, I've also been busy on the talk page, more busy than I'd like to be, in fact... Jeh (talk) 00:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i was wondering has any body u know got a halo 2 XP patch. seriously i getting fed up with vista this and vista that it needs to fuck off.

Why bother with Halo 2? The game is a step back from Halo 1 in graphics, music and storytelling. Anyhow, you can get a patch here.--Anss123 (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Than you so fucking much man even though i'm not gay(true) i'd kiss ya(just kidding) but seriously i'm so fucking happy man i hope it works... and for your sake you'd better hope so as well cause if it doesn't i will hunt you down and kill you >:(

just kidding

it isn't a rar and wen i change it to 1 i can't open it. do u know why??? <:( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.238.244 (talk) 11:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Try this zip file then.--Anss123 (talk) 13:32, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks u don't know wat this means to me unless you u are a mind reader. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.236.16 (talk) 09:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much,

seriously thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.236.16 (talk) 09:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your response on the straw poll for the flagged revs trial and am a bit confused because you added a weak oppose, yet appear to be supporting flagged revs in your reasoning. I was wondering if you were aware of this, or it was simply a mistake. Thanks, —

Hello, Anss123. You have new messages at Nn123645's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your arguing was wrong - see my edit summary. And please do not remove the link again, the article has too few sources and any external info (in this case through an externa link) is valuable. Thank you!--Kozuch (talk) 13:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't check this one for Vista before adding that. :-) Can you check for Windows 7 as well? - xpclient ^Talk 04:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see it in Win7.--Anss123 (talk) 07:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to double clarify, you mean it's removed in Windows 7 but present in Windows Vista? - xpclient ^Talk 14:15, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes.--Anss123 (talk) 15:23, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added to the talk page, because I am gearing up for editing the IBM PC Article End to End to remove all of the GLARING factual inaccuracies, to improve its quality so that someone will be able to wikifiy it and have a more accurate/factual basis to start from. Thanks for noticing, and I am deep in citations and references 69.232.192.143 (talk) 08:52, 20 February 2011 (UTC)--[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Anss123. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anss123. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]