User talk:Apatronoftruth

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregchilders (talk • contribs)

The "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" is part of every page here. He didn't add it. However, the warning was inappropriate (it is, under

, a level 3 warning for someone who has already received level 1 and 2 warnings.

It seems clear there are issues with the article, and I will arrange to have other experienced Wikipedia editors take a look at it shortly. I have also warned the other editor about removing comments from the article Talk page. That is quite forbidden. Fan-1967 15:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification and your assistance in this matter.

Apatronoftruth 01:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apatronoftruth is nothing more than a coward hiding behind an anonymous alias.

Gregchilders 03:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Like anyone cares what Gregchilders thinks.

Apatronoftruth 03:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Or else you wouldn't spend your entire weekend editing a single article on Wikipedia.

Gregchilders 04:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Mr. Childers, please don't think that this debate is any indication of your importance. This started as an attempt to correct your dishonesty. At this point, your insistance that there is a performance troupe and your avoidance of answering questions is just further showing, to all the local and national performers, the type person you really are, as opposed to the person you portray online.

I hope you realize that all of this could have been avoided by simply by admitting that there is no performance troupe. I still cannot fathom why you insist that there is.

Do you care to answer why you still insist there is a performance troupe?

Apatronoftruth 04:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Factual information only should go in the article. Commentary and opinions should be confined to the article Talk page. Fan-1967 21:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It was not I who has made multiple edits to the entry today. While I want to have the truth reflected in the article, I know that the discussion page is where the questions edited in the entry "E.S.Roberts" belongs.

Apatronoftruth 23:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to

]

Thank you for the warning. Seeing as Mr. Childers seems to have given up, and thereby has left me with nothing to correct, I await the decision on the fate of the entry. I apologize for my violation. I now have read

WP:3RR

and understand the rules.

Again, I am sorry for the violation of the 3RR rule.

Apatronoftruth 03:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Pop by my talk page if you have any questions or comments! Cheers, Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Per

]

From The Wiseguys

You deserve a smiley face for your hard work in trying to save The Wiseguys page! Enjoy!