User talk:Architectlover

Please do not remove

Bureau for Investigative Journalism

. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:16, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Angus Stickler

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Angus Stickler, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://thebureauinvestigates.com/who-we-are.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

talk) 16:20, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Rachel Oldroyd

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:21, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]