User talk:Athousandcuts2005

Hi Athousandcuts2005! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 19:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I know I should WP:Assume good faith but you look like corporate bot. If I'm wrong then I'm sorry and I hope I haven't made you feel unwelcome and that you enjoy contributing to wikipedia. If you are a corporate bot I hope you stub your toe. Alexanderkowal (talk) 18:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Reform UK. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — kashmīrī ^TALK 17:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Athousandcuts2005.

Regarding your recent edit of the Wiki article on the Northern Irish politician Jim Allister, could you take a moment to reply to a couple of queries I have concerning parts of it?

As I understand it, in Wikipedia the content of an article ought to be relevant to the subject of the article.

What is the relation of the following phrase "said to have been done as a "birthday present" for Billy Wright"   to the article's subject (the Northern Irish unionist politician Jim Allister)?

Also, what is the relation of the phrase "who was already serving 12 years for gun possession"   to Mr Allister?

If you would like, we could open a discussion of the matter on the article's Talk page. BrownBowler (talk) 12:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]