User talk:Audigex
Yes you are
:D -ParalysedBeaver 14:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Siege of Badajoz (1812)
Could you please have a look at the latest corrective edit regarding the 4,000 civilian casualties. I have ask this editor to provide a verifiable source to justify the figure.
If you read further into the edit I made, including the links, you will see that there is now a verifiable and trustworthy source for the lower numbers I have quoted.
As you can see, this type of re-edit has happened regularly over the years :
> 7 May 2019 86.241.175.56 talk 18,951 bytes -33 Reverted to pre-vandalism numbers. > 5 May 2019 Richard Tennant talk contribs 18,984 bytes +1,168 revised civilian casualties
> 23 September 2015 Crystallizedcarbon talk contribs m 16,759 bytes +24 Reverted edits by 163.1.19.1 (talk) (HG) > 23 September 2015 163.1.19.1 talk 16,735 bytes -24 Muir's biography of Wellington (p456) says that the highest estimate of civilian deaths at Badajoz is 100, so `massacred 4000 civilians' seems inaccurate.
> 5 January 2015 83.113.239.186 talk 15,494 bytes +4 restored numbers from before british revisionism > 7 December 2014 83.47.32.151 talk 15,490 bytes -9 The troops killed between 100 and 200 Spanish civilians, otherwise they would have masscred the entire population of Badajoz, which at the time had less than 5,000 inhabitants.
> 14 July 2014 Ruddah talk contribs 15,007 bytes -10 Undid revision 616926361 by 2.138.12.241 (talk) > 14 July 2014 2.138.12.241 talk 15,017 bytes +10 I have changed the number of Spanish civilians killed by the troops. > 13 July 2014 Ruddah talk contribs 15,007 bytes +1 Undid revision 616831566 by 2.138.12.241 (talk) > 13 July 2014 2.138.12.241 talk 15,006 bytes -1 I have changed the number of Spanish civilians killed after Badajoz was taken.
Many thanks Richard Tennant (talk) 09:10, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the